The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy.
| Title: | The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Chazdon, Robin L.1 (AUTHOR) rchazdon@usc.edu.au, Falk, Donald A.2 (AUTHOR), Banin, Lindsay F.3 (AUTHOR), Wagner, Markus4 (AUTHOR), J. Wilson, Sarah5 (AUTHOR), Grabowski, Robert C.6 (AUTHOR), Suding, Katherine N.7 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Restoration Ecology. Nov2024, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p1-13. 13p. |
| Subject Terms: | *RESTORATION ecology, *FINANCIAL policy, *PEATLAND restoration, *ECOSYSTEMS, *STREAM restoration, *GRASSLANDS, *TERMS & phrases |
| Abstract: | The distinction often made between active and passive restoration approaches is a false dichotomy that persists in much research, policy, and financial structures today. We explore the contradictions imposed by this terminology and the merits of replacing this dichotomy with a continuum‐based intervention framework. In practice, the main distinction between "passive" and "active" restoration lies primarily in the timing and extent of human interventions. We apply the intervention continuum framework to forest, grassland, stream, and peatland ecosystems, emphasizing that a range of restoration approaches within the scope of ecological or ecosystem restoration are typically employed in most projects, and all can contribute to the recovery of native ecosystems and prevention of further degradation. As restoration is fundamentally about the recovery of ecosystems, eliminating human sources of degradation is essential to enable ecosystem recovery processes, regardless of subsequent interventions that may be needed to assist recovery. Our review of restoration practices involving different levels of intervention highlights the benefits of recognizing a broader suite of restoration interventions in the financial and policy frameworks that currently underpin restoration activity. Effective restoration interventions emerge from an understanding of nature's intrinsic recovery potential and overcoming specific obstacles that limit this potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Restoration Ecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Academic Search Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: other Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:a9h&genre=article&issn=10612971&ISBN=&volume=32&issue=8&date=20241101&spage=1&pages=1-13&title=Restoration Ecology&atitle=The%20intervention%20continuum%20in%20restoration%20ecology%3A%20rethinking%20the%20active%E2%80%93passive%20dichotomy.&aulast=Chazdon%2C%20Robin%20L.&id=DOI:10.1111/rec.13535 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: a9h DbLabel: Academic Search Complete An: 180656368 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chazdon%2C+Robin+L%2E%22">Chazdon, Robin L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> rchazdon@usc.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Falk%2C+Donald+A%2E%22">Falk, Donald A.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Banin%2C+Lindsay+F%2E%22">Banin, Lindsay F.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wagner%2C+Markus%22">Wagner, Markus</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22J%2E+Wilson%2C+Sarah%22">J. Wilson, Sarah</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grabowski%2C+Robert+C%2E%22">Grabowski, Robert C.</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Suding%2C+Katherine+N%2E%22">Suding, Katherine N.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Restoration+Ecology%22">Restoration Ecology</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p1-13. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESTORATION+ecology%22">RESTORATION ecology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22FINANCIAL+policy%22">FINANCIAL policy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22PEATLAND+restoration%22">PEATLAND restoration</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ECOSYSTEMS%22">ECOSYSTEMS</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STREAM+restoration%22">STREAM restoration</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22GRASSLANDS%22">GRASSLANDS</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22TERMS+%26+phrases%22">TERMS & phrases</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The distinction often made between active and passive restoration approaches is a false dichotomy that persists in much research, policy, and financial structures today. We explore the contradictions imposed by this terminology and the merits of replacing this dichotomy with a continuum‐based intervention framework. In practice, the main distinction between "passive" and "active" restoration lies primarily in the timing and extent of human interventions. We apply the intervention continuum framework to forest, grassland, stream, and peatland ecosystems, emphasizing that a range of restoration approaches within the scope of ecological or ecosystem restoration are typically employed in most projects, and all can contribute to the recovery of native ecosystems and prevention of further degradation. As restoration is fundamentally about the recovery of ecosystems, eliminating human sources of degradation is essential to enable ecosystem recovery processes, regardless of subsequent interventions that may be needed to assist recovery. Our review of restoration practices involving different levels of intervention highlights the benefits of recognizing a broader suite of restoration interventions in the financial and policy frameworks that currently underpin restoration activity. Effective restoration interventions emerge from an understanding of nature's intrinsic recovery potential and overcoming specific obstacles that limit this potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Restoration Ecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=a9h&AN=180656368 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/rec.13535 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: RESTORATION ecology Type: general – SubjectFull: FINANCIAL policy Type: general – SubjectFull: PEATLAND restoration Type: general – SubjectFull: ECOSYSTEMS Type: general – SubjectFull: STREAM restoration Type: general – SubjectFull: GRASSLANDS Type: general – SubjectFull: TERMS & phrases Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chazdon, Robin L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Falk, Donald A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Banin, Lindsay F. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wagner, Markus – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: J. Wilson, Sarah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grabowski, Robert C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Suding, Katherine N. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10612971 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 8 Titles: – TitleFull: Restoration Ecology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |