Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
The intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy. |
| Authors: |
Chazdon, Robin L.1 (AUTHOR) rchazdon@usc.edu.au, Falk, Donald A.2 (AUTHOR), Banin, Lindsay F.3 (AUTHOR), Wagner, Markus4 (AUTHOR), J. Wilson, Sarah5 (AUTHOR), Grabowski, Robert C.6 (AUTHOR), Suding, Katherine N.7 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Restoration Ecology. Nov2024, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p1-13. 13p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*RESTORATION ecology, *FINANCIAL policy, *PEATLAND restoration, *ECOSYSTEMS, *STREAM restoration, *GRASSLANDS, *TERMS & phrases |
| Abstract: |
The distinction often made between active and passive restoration approaches is a false dichotomy that persists in much research, policy, and financial structures today. We explore the contradictions imposed by this terminology and the merits of replacing this dichotomy with a continuum‐based intervention framework. In practice, the main distinction between "passive" and "active" restoration lies primarily in the timing and extent of human interventions. We apply the intervention continuum framework to forest, grassland, stream, and peatland ecosystems, emphasizing that a range of restoration approaches within the scope of ecological or ecosystem restoration are typically employed in most projects, and all can contribute to the recovery of native ecosystems and prevention of further degradation. As restoration is fundamentally about the recovery of ecosystems, eliminating human sources of degradation is essential to enable ecosystem recovery processes, regardless of subsequent interventions that may be needed to assist recovery. Our review of restoration practices involving different levels of intervention highlights the benefits of recognizing a broader suite of restoration interventions in the financial and policy frameworks that currently underpin restoration activity. Effective restoration interventions emerge from an understanding of nature's intrinsic recovery potential and overcoming specific obstacles that limit this potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Restoration Ecology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
