Effects of Child Characteristics on the Outcomes of a Parent Support Program

Bibliographic Details
Title: Effects of Child Characteristics on the Outcomes of a Parent Support Program
Language: English
Authors: Hudson, Alan, Reece, John, Cameron, Christine, Matthews, Jan
Source: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. Jun 2009 34(2):123-132.
Availability: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2009
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Age Differences, Mental Retardation, Program Effectiveness, Effect Size, Individual Characteristics, Family Programs, Gender Differences, Disabilities, Children, Early Adolescents, Adolescents, Foreign Countries, Child Rearing, Parenting Skills, Parent Education, Anxiety, Stress Variables, Depression (Psychology), Self Efficacy, Satisfaction, Child Behavior, Behavior Problems, Interpersonal Communication, Interpersonal Competence, Aggression
Geographic Terms: Australia
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Developmental Behavior Checklist
DOI: 10.1080/13668250902850426
ISSN: 1366-8250
Abstract: Background: Previous research has reported on the effectiveness of the Signposts program for supporting families of children with an intellectual disability and difficult behaviour (Hudson et al., 2003; Hudson, Cameron, & Matthews, 2008). This paper reports on an investigation of the extent to which child characteristics moderate the effectiveness of the program. Method: Data collected from 689 participants in the Signposts program were analysed to examine if the child characteristics of gender, age, or associated disability impacted on outcomes. Results: The gender analyses produced mean effect sizes of 0.39 for boys and 0.42 for girls; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The age analyses produced mean effect sizes of 0.38 for children aged 2-5 years, 0.42 for children aged 6-12 years, and 0.30 for children aged 13-18 years; however, these differences among the age groups were not statistically significant. The associated disability analyses across 7 groups produced mean effect sizes ranging from 0.31 to 0.75; however, the differences among these groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: First, gender was not a moderating variable. Second, while the effect size for the older age group seemed to be marginally lower than that of the other two groups, age was not found to be a moderating variable. Finally, type of associated disability was not found to be a moderating variable. Methodological limitations of the study necessitate care in interpreting the findings. (Contains 3 tables.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 23
Entry Date: 2009
Accession Number: EJ858487
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:1366-8250
DOI:10.1080/13668250902850426
Published in:Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
Language:English