Graph Out Loud: Pre-Service Teachers' Data Decisions and Interpretations of CBM Progress Graphs

Bibliographic Details
Title: Graph Out Loud: Pre-Service Teachers' Data Decisions and Interpretations of CBM Progress Graphs
Language: English
Authors: Jessica R. Toste (ORCID 0000-0002-6327-0054), Marissa J. Filderman, Nathan H. Clemens (ORCID 0000-0002-8361-1303), Erica Fry (ORCID 0009-0008-9393-1408)
Source: Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2025 58(1):33-45.
Availability: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R324A190126
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Data Use, Decision Making, Progress Monitoring, Visual Aids, Special Education Teachers, Teaching Methods, Measurement Techniques, Protocol Analysis, Verbal Communication, Reading Difficulties
Geographic Terms: Texas, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia
DOI: 10.1177/00222194241231768
ISSN: 0022-2194
1538-4780
Abstract: Data-based instruction (DBI) is a process in which teachers use progress data to make ongoing instructional decisions for students with learning disabilities. Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a common form of progress monitoring, and CBM data are placed on a graph to guide decision-making. Despite the central role that graph interpretation plays in the successful implementation of DBI, relatively little attention has been devoted to investigating this skill among special education teachers. In the present study, we examined the data decisions of 32 U.S. pre-service special education teachers (29 females and 3 males). Participants viewed data presented sequentially on CBM progress graphs and used a think-aloud procedure to explain their reasoning each time they indicated they would make instructional changes. We also asked participants to make the same type of decisions in response to static CBM progress graphs depicting 10 weeks of data. Overall, there was inconsistency in pre-service teachers' responses related to "when" or "why" they would make an instructional change. Decisions were often influenced by graph-related features, such as variability in the data. Furthermore, responses suggested misunderstandings that led to premature instructional change decisions and reliance on individual data points.
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1453775
Database: ERIC
More Details
ISSN:0022-2194
1538-4780
DOI:10.1177/00222194241231768
Published in:Journal of Learning Disabilities
Language:English