The Speaking Proficiency Outcomes of Face-to-Face and Online Intensive Summer LCTL Programs

Bibliographic Details
Title: The Speaking Proficiency Outcomes of Face-to-Face and Online Intensive Summer LCTL Programs
Language: English
Authors: Dianna Murphy (ORCID 0000-0001-9716-0032), Sonya K. Sedivy (ORCID 0000-0002-5031-7837)
Source: Foreign Language Annals. 2024 57(4):872-899.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Postsecondary Education (ED)
Department of Education (ED)
Contract Number: P017A20001421
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Language Proficiency, Oral Language, Language Tests, Arabic, Sino Tibetan Languages, Turkic Languages, Indo European Languages, Dravidian Languages, Portuguese, Indonesian, Turkish, Urdu, Language Variation, Intensive Language Courses, Outcomes of Education, Uncommonly Taught Languages, Online Courses, COVID-19, Pandemics, Summer Programs, In Person Learning, Second Language Programs
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview
DOI: 10.1111/flan.12758
ISSN: 0015-718X
1944-9720
Abstract: This article is the first large-scale study to document the speaking proficiency outcomes of intensive programs in less commonly taught languages in US higher education. Speaking proficiency was measured by pre- and postprogram ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interviews (N = 484) in 14 languages: Arabic, Bengali, Brazilian Portuguese, Hindi, Indonesian, Kazakh, Persian, Tamil, Thai, Tibetan, Turkish, Urdu, Uyghur, and Uzbek. The intensive programs are usually taught face-to-face but were offered fully online during the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference in speaking proficiency outcomes, as measured by the ACTFL OPI, was found between the face-to-face and online formats. Students at all levels of instruction made significant gains in speaking proficiency, with greater gains made by students in Level 1 than at Levels 2-3, and with wide variation within instructional levels. The average speaking proficiency outcomes were Advanced Low (Level 3), Intermediate High (Level 2), and between Intermediate Low and Intermediate Mid (Level 1).
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1452841
Database: ERIC
More Details
ISSN:0015-718X
1944-9720
DOI:10.1111/flan.12758
Published in:Foreign Language Annals
Language:English