Using Mnemonics, Remote Coaching, and the Range-Bound Changing Criterion Design to Teach College Students with IDD to Make Employment Decisions

Bibliographic Details
Title: Using Mnemonics, Remote Coaching, and the Range-Bound Changing Criterion Design to Teach College Students with IDD to Make Employment Decisions
Language: English
Authors: Brady, Michael P., Kearney, Kelly B., Downey, Angelica, Torres, Ayse, McDougall, Dennis
Source: Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities. Sep 2022 57(3):303-319.
Availability: Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children. DDD, P.O. Box 3512, Fayetteville, AR 72702. Tel: 479-575-3326; Fax: 479-575-6676; Web site: http://www.daddcec.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities, College Students, Coaching (Performance), Educational Technology, Mnemonics, Teaching Methods, Decision Making, Skill Development, Intervention, Program Effectiveness, Employment, Technology Uses in Education
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
ISSN: 2154-1647
Abstract: Adults with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) increasingly are accessing inclusive college programs to gain academic and employment preparation for future community living. Decision-making and self-determination are two inter-related skills taught in these programs. In this study, we investigated an intervention that combined remote audio coaching (RAC) and a mnemonic strategy to teach employment decision-making skills to three college students with IDD. We evaluated the intervention using the range-bound changing criterion design to assess students' stepwise progress. All students substantially increased their employment decision-making skills, generalized those skills to a novel job coach who was not part of the intervention, and maintained the skills after the intervention was removed. We discuss implications of the procedures and results of this decision-making intervention, as well as the goodness-of-fit of the experimental design for evaluating controlled, gradual skill increases.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Access URL: https://www.daddcec.com/etadd.html
Accession Number: EJ1357369
Database: ERIC