Comparability of Postural and Physical Activity Metrics from Different Accelerometer Brands Worn on the Thigh: Data Harmonization Possibilities

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparability of Postural and Physical Activity Metrics from Different Accelerometer Brands Worn on the Thigh: Data Harmonization Possibilities
Language: English
Authors: Edwardson, Charlotte L., Maylor, Benjamin D. (ORCID 0000-0002-4503-0479), Dawkins, Nathan P., Plekhanova, Tatiana, Rowlands, Alex V. (ORCID 0000-0002-1463-697X)
Source: Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2022 26(1):39-50.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Human Posture, Physical Activity Level, Measurement Equipment, Life Style, Adults, School Personnel, College Students, Foreign Countries, Measurement Techniques, Accuracy
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom (England)
DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2021.1944154
ISSN: 1091-367X
Abstract: The aim was to establish which postural and physical activity outcomes are comparable across different accelerometer brands worn on the thigh when processed using open-source methods. Twenty participants wore four accelerometers (Axivity, ActiGraph, activPAL, GENEActiv) for three free-living days. Postural and physical activity outputs (average acceleration, intensity gradient, intensity of the most active 30 min, 60 min, and 8 h) were generated. "Postural outputs": Mean absolute percent errors (MAPEs) were low, reliability excellent, and equivalency within the 5% zone across all monitor pairings for sitting/lying and upright times, but not specific lying postures. "Physical activity outputs": MAPEs were higher and reliability lower than for sitting/lying and upright time. However, the majority of the outcomes were within the 10% equivalency zone for Axivity/GENEActiv and Axivity/ActiGraph pairings. Total sitting/lying and upright times show strong potential for harmonization across studies utilizing different thigh-worn accelerometers. The majority of acceleration outcomes compare well for Axivity, GENEActiv, and ActiGraph.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1328303
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:1091-367X
DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2021.1944154
Published in:Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Language:English