Error-Discovery Learning Boosts Student Engagement and Performance, While Reducing Student Attrition in a Bioinformatics Course

Bibliographic Details
Title: Error-Discovery Learning Boosts Student Engagement and Performance, While Reducing Student Attrition in a Bioinformatics Course
Language: English
Authors: Lee, Christopher J., Toven-Lindsey, Brit, Shapiro, Casey, Soh, Michael, Mazrouee, Sepideh, Levis-Fitzgerald, Marc, Sanders, Erin R.
Source: CBE - Life Sciences Education. Sep 2018 17(3).
Availability: American Society for Cell Biology. 8120 Woodmont Avenue Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20814-2762. Tel: 301-347-9300; Fax: 301-347-9310; e-mail: ascbinfo@ascb.org; Website: http://www.ascb.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2018
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (DHHS)
Contract Number: 5R25GM114822
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Active Learning, Problem Solving, Discovery Learning, Misconceptions, Learner Engagement, Academic Achievement, Biology, Information Science, Student Attrition, Outcomes of Education, Hypothesis Testing, Comparative Analysis, Science Instruction, Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students
Geographic Terms: California (Los Angeles)
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.17-04-0061
ISSN: 1931-7913
Abstract: We sought to test a hypothesis that systemic blind spots in active learning are a barrier both for instructors--who cannot see what every student is actually thinking on each concept in each class--and for students--who often cannot tell precisely whether their thinking is right or wrong, let alone exactly how to fix it. We tested a strategy for eliminating these blind spots by having students answer open-ended, conceptual problems using a Web-based platform, and measured the effects on student attrition, engagement, and performance. In 4 years of testing both in class and using an online platform, this approach revealed (and provided specific resolution lessons for) more than 200 distinct conceptual errors, dramatically increased average student engagement, and reduced student attrition by approximately fourfold compared with the original lecture course format (down from 48.3% to 11.4%), especially for women undergraduates (down from 73.1% to 7.4%). Median exam scores increased from 53% to 72-80%, and the bottom half of students boosted their scores to the range in which the top half had scored before the pedagogical switch. By contrast, in our control year with the same active-learning content (but without this "zero blind spots" approach), these gains were not observed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 63
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: EJ1186027
Database: ERIC
More Details
ISSN:1931-7913
DOI:10.1187/cbe.17-04-0061
Published in:CBE - Life Sciences Education
Language:English