Efficacy of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction for Developing Writers with and without Disabilities in Rural Schools: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bibliographic Details
Title: Efficacy of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction for Developing Writers with and without Disabilities in Rural Schools: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Language: English
Authors: Mason, Linda H., Cramer, Anne Mong, Garwood, Justin D., Varghese, Cheryl, Hamm, Jill, Murray, Allen
Source: Rural Special Education Quarterly. Dec 2017 36(4):168-179.
Availability: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2017
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R305A040056
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Grade 5
Intermediate Grades
Middle Schools
Grade 6
Descriptors: Writing Strategies, Writing Instruction, Disabilities, Rural Schools, Randomized Controlled Trials, Comparative Analysis, Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers, Grade 5, Grade 6, Writing Workshops, Faculty Development, Persuasive Discourse, Program Evaluation, General Education, Inclusion, Outcomes of Education, Writing Improvement, Statistical Analysis, Writing Tests, Pretests Posttests, Writing Skills, Multivariate Analysis, Intervention
DOI: 10.1177/8756870517723617
ISSN: 8756-8705
Abstract: A workshop with virtual consultation practice-based professional development model for self-regulated strategy development persuasive writing instruction was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. Nineteen general education teachers and 564 Grade 5 and 6 students in 16 low-wealth rural schools participated. Following training, teachers provided instruction in their inclusive classrooms. Results indicated that students receiving instruction improved in the number of persuasive elements and words written when compared with students in the control group. Differences in element type were evaluated with largest effects noted for reasons and explanations. Student group differences were noted with nonstruggling students having greater gains than struggling students.
Abstractor: As Provided
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Reviewed: Does Not Meet Evidence Standards
WWC Study Page: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/90327
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2017
Accession Number: EJ1160141
Database: ERIC
More Details
ISSN:8756-8705
DOI:10.1177/8756870517723617
Published in:Rural Special Education Quarterly
Language:English