Agency, Socialization, and Support: A Critical Review of Doctoral Student Attrition
| Title: | Agency, Socialization, and Support: A Critical Review of Doctoral Student Attrition |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Rigler, Kenneth L., Bowlin, Linda K., Sweat, Karen, Watts, Stephen, Throne, Robin |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2017Paper presented at the International Conference on Doctoral Education (3rd, Orlando, FL, 2017). |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 27 |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Document Type: | Information Analyses Speeches/Meeting Papers Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Graduate Students, Doctoral Programs, Student Attrition, Academic Persistence, School Holding Power, Department Heads, Teacher Student Relationship, Socialization, Social Support Groups, Readiness, Financial Support, Doctoral Dissertations, Literature Reviews |
| Abstract: | Almost universally, residential doctoral programs have reported attrition rates of up to 50% for face-to-face programs and 50-70% for online doctoral programs. The purpose of this critical review was to explore current literature for doctoral attrition and persistence to explore reasons and attributes for improved persistence to completion. We analyzed a final sample of 79 studies for context with doctoral attrition and persistence and, following coding, pattern matching, and synthesis, four final constructs emerged: (a) chair agency and chair-candidate relationship; (b) candidate socialization and support systems; (c) candidate preparedness; and (d) financial considerations. These constructs indicated that internal factors from within the doctoral program have affected attrition and we encourage doctoral educational leadership to implement strategies to improve dissertation chair practices through professional development, increased candidate support and socialization opportunities, creation of clearer pathways from academic to dissertation research coursework, and improved financial opportunities and support for candidates. We recommend quantitative explanatory studies to further examine the four factors within the doctoral program to examine the effects on doctoral candidate completion. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 50 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | ED580853 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Published in: | Online Submission |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |