Remittance payment processing with account scheming and/or validation

Bibliographic Details
Title: Remittance payment processing with account scheming and/or validation
Patent Number: 7,996,311
Publication Date: August 09, 2011
Appl. No: 12/361289
Application Filed: January 28, 2009
Abstract: Systems and methods of remittance processing where a merchant database is provided that includes one or more alteration rules that are associated with a particular payee. A consumer account number associated with a payor is received and altered into a modified consumer account number, where the alteration is performed in accordance with one or more of the stored alteration rules. The modified consumer account number may then be transmitted to the particular payee to be utilized, for example, when processing a payment.
Inventors: Garrison, David Lee (Columbus, OH, US); Kight, Patricia A. (Dublin, OH, US); Perkins, Brad (Dublin, OH, US); Ward, Cheryl Lynn (Hilliard, OH, US); Lawson, Mary Elizabeth (Dublin, OH, US); Kerin, Amy Lynn (Delaware, OH, US)
Assignees: Checkfree Corporation (Norcross, GA, US)
Claim: 1. A method, comprising: executing computer-implemented instructions on one or more payment processor computers associated with a payment processor for: receiving, by the payment processor, a consumer account number associated with a payor and a payee, wherein the consumer account number is not in a format expected by the payee; retrieving from a merchant database, by the payment processor, an alteration rule associated with the payee, wherein the alteration rule is associated with an account number format that is expected by the payee; altering, by the payment processor, the received consumer account number to a modified consumer account number based upon the alteration rule, wherein altering the consumer account number includes inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number to create the modified consumer account number; and transmitting, by the payment processor, the modified consumer account number to the payee.
Claim: 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the consumer account number is received in association with a payment request to pay the payee on behalf of the payor.
Claim: 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the modified consumer account number is transmitted to the payee along with payment in fulfillment of the payment request.
Claim: 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the payment request is one of a plurality of payment requests received together.
Claim: 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein retrieving the alteration rule from the merchant database includes identifying stored payee information associated with the payee on the merchant database and retrieving the alteration rule from the stored payee information associated with the payee on the merchant database.
Claim: 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein identifying stored payee information associated with the payee on the merchant database includes searching for the stored payee information associated with the payee based on at least a portion of payee information received with the consumer account number.
Claim: 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein searching for stored payee information associated with the payee based on at least a portion of payee information received with the consumer account number includes generating an eleven-digit zip code from the at least a portion of payee information received with the consumer account number and searching for stored payee information associated with the payee using at least the eleven-digit zip code.
Claim: 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer-implemented instructions are first computer-implemented instructions, and further comprising: executing second computer-implemented instructions on the one or more payment processor computers for: retrieving from the merchant database, by the payment processor, a validation template associated with the payee, wherein the validation template identifies a general account number format to which an account number associated with the payee must conform; and verifying, by the payment processor, the received consumer account number against the retrieved validation template.
Claim: 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein verifying the received consumer account number against the retrieved validation template includes at least one of (i) verifying that the received consumer account number includes a specific character string, (ii) verifying that the received consumer account number is of a specific length, or (iii) verifying that the received consumer account number yields a particular check digit after being run through a specific check algorithm.
Claim: 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the verifying is performed prior to the altering.
Claim: 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number includes inserting a fixed character string specified by the payee.
Claim: 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number includes inserting at least a portion of information associated with the payor.
Claim: 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer-implemented instructions are first computer-implemented instructions, and further comprising: executing second computer-implemented instructions on the one or more payment processor computers for: retrieving from the merchant database, by the payment processor, an identification of a remittance center associated with the payee, wherein the modified consumer account number is transmitted to the remittance center.
Claim: 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein retrieving the identification of the remittance center comprises retrieving the identification of the remittance center based on a characteristic of one of (i) the received consumer account number or (ii) the modified consumer account number.
Claim: 15. A system comprising: a merchant database, one or more payment processor computers in communication with the merchant database, wherein the one or more payment processor computers are configured to execute computer-implemented instructions to: receive a consumer account number associated with a payor and a payee, wherein the consumer account number is not in a format expected by the payee; retrieve, from the merchant database, an alteration rule associated with the payee, wherein the alteration rule is associated with an account number format that is expected by the payee; alter the received consumer account number to a modified consumer account number based upon the alteration rule, wherein altering the consumer account number includes inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number to create the modified consumer account number; and transmit the modified consumer account number to the payee.
Claim: 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the consumer account number is received in association with a payment request to pay the payee on behalf of the payor.
Claim: 17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more payment processor computers are further configured to execute computer-implemented instructions to: retrieve, from the merchant database, a validation template associated with the payee, wherein the validation template identifies a general account number format to which an account number associated with the payee must conform; and verify the received consumer account number against the retrieved validation template.
Claim: 18. The system of claim 15 , wherein inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number includes inserting a fixed character string specified by the payee.
Claim: 19. The system of claim 15 , wherein inserting a character string at a particular position in the consumer account number includes inserting at least a portion of information associated with the payor.
Claim: 20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more payment processor computers are further configured to execute computer-implemented instructions to: retrieve, from the merchant database, an identification of a remittance center associated with the payee, wherein the modified consumer account number is transmitted to the remittance center.
Current U.S. Class: 705/40
Patent References Cited: 4774664 September 1988 Campbell et al.
4871903 October 1989 Carrell
4908850 March 1990 Masson et al.
4947028 August 1990 Gorog
5153907 October 1992 Pugh et al.
5197094 March 1993 Tillery et al.
5208593 May 1993 Tong et al.
5220501 June 1993 Lawlor et al.
5222018 June 1993 Sharpe et al.
5283829 February 1994 Anderson
5298731 March 1994 Ett
5325290 June 1994 Cauffman et al.
5326959 July 1994 Perazza
5336870 August 1994 Hughes et al.
5383113 January 1995 Kight et al.
5420405 May 1995 Chasek
5432326 July 1995 Noblett, Jr. et al.
5465206 November 1995 Hilt et al.
5504677 April 1996 Pollin
5612889 March 1997 Pintsov et al.
5649114 July 1997 Deaton et al.
5649117 July 1997 Landry
5677955 October 1997 Doggett et al.
5684965 November 1997 Pickering
5699528 December 1997 Hogan
5707286 January 1998 Carlson
5717868 February 1998 James
5727249 March 1998 Pollin
5740549 April 1998 Reilly et al.
5754938 May 1998 Herz et al.
5781654 July 1998 Carney
5819291 October 1998 Haimowitz et al.
5826165 October 1998 Echeita et al.
5826245 October 1998 Sandberg-Diment
5835087 November 1998 Herz et al.
5873072 February 1999 Kight et al.
5880446 March 1999 Mori et al.
5909670 June 1999 Trader et al.
5915243 June 1999 Smolen
5920847 July 1999 Kolling et al.
5920848 July 1999 Schutzer et al.
5933811 August 1999 Angles et al.
5953427 September 1999 Cordery et al.
5956700 September 1999 Landry
5963925 October 1999 Kolling et al.
5966698 October 1999 Pollin
5978780 November 1999 Watson
6021202 February 2000 Anderson et al.
6026385 February 2000 Harvey et al.
6029150 February 2000 Kravitz
6035285 March 2000 Schlect et al.
6070150 May 2000 Remington et al.
6119104 September 2000 Brumbelow et al.
6119106 September 2000 Mersky et al.
6311170 October 2001 Embrey
6327577 December 2001 Garrison et al.
6438527 August 2002 Powar
6968319 November 2005 Remington et al.
7490063 February 2009 Garrison et al.
2001/0001148 May 2001 Martin et al.
2002/0026394 February 2002 Savage et al.
0649105 April 1995
0780807 June 1997
0782108 July 1997
2283588 May 1995
63268086 November 1988
2001-556 January 2001
97/34243 September 1997
99/56219 November 1999
00/08612 February 2000




















Other References: NPL article: “New E-commerce Management Solution from ibill” dated Dec. 10, 1997, 3 pages; ibill == Internet Billing Co. Ltd. (Note: This NPL Was Provided With Non-Final Rejection Mailed Out on Jun. 2, 2009.). cited by examiner
“11-digit Zip Code Causes Concern,” Mar. 1993, Direct, p. 16. cited by other
“1995 Software Guide: Conveying the message faster, more efficiently,” Direct Marketing [Downloaded from PROQUEST]. vol. 58, No. 2, Jun. 1995. p. 46- [printed pp. 1-10]. cited by other
Anonymous, “Communications in Managing Modern Payment Systems,” Management Accounting, London, Jul./Aug. 1997, vol. 75, issue 7. cited by other
Anonymous, “Industry Protests Curb US Routing Number Reforms,” Cash Management News. Jul./Aug. 1994, n101, pp. 1-2. cited by other
Anonymous, “The Card Industry Cools Its Heels Waiting for a Fraud-Busting Code,” Gale Group Newsletter DB™, 2001 The Gale Group, Credit Card News, v5, n26, May 1, 1993. cited by other
Article from PRNewswire, dated Dec. 10, 1997 and titled: “Remittance Payment Processing with Account Scheming and/or Validation,” 5 pages. cited by other
Bruce Zagaris and Scott B. MacDonald, “Money Laundering, Financial Fraud, and Technology: The Perils of an Instantaneous Economy,” The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, Washington: 1992, vol. 26m, Issue 1: pp. 1-32. cited by other
Declaration of Mary Elizabeth Lawson (3 pages). cited by other
Disclosure Statement Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.56 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/361,289. cited by other
Final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/043,247, which is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 08/994,047. cited by other
Final Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/443,864. cited by other
“History of the U.S. Postal Service: 1775-1993, ”Downloaded from Internet [retrieved on Jul. 30, 2002]. cited by other
“How Combined Billing Could Save Utilities Money,” Jan. 21, 1993, Phillipos Business Information, Inc.,vol. 4, No. 1. (on May 4, 2001 in related U.S. Appl. No. 08/994,047, copy unavailable). cited by other
Jocelyn P. Taylor, “CheckFraud: Preventative Measures for Businesses,” Journal of Cash Management, v12n1, pp. 34-38, Jan./Feb. 1992. cited by other
Notess, Greg et al. “On the Nets: Internet Ready Reference Resources,” [Downloaded from PROQUEST]. vol. 19, No. 2, Apr./May 1996. pp. 88-91. cited by other
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/043,247, which is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 08/994,047. cited by other
Pavely, Richard W., “Automation brings changes to USPS,” Jan. 1993, Office, v117n1 pp. 42. cited by other
“Postalsoft, Inc., Delivers Address-Correction Tool,” American Banker [Downloaded from PROQUEST]. vol. 159, No. 88, May 9, 1994, p. 16A—[printed pp. 1-2]. cited by other
Rose, Matthew; Castellano, Brenda; Di Bella, Lori, Direct Marketing software guide. (guide for software packages for marketing), Jun. 1989, direct Marketing, vv52, n2, p. 53(23). cited by other
“SSN Verifier Another Step Toward Stemming Fraud,” Gale Group Newsletter DB™, 2001 The Gale Group, Item Processing Report, v5, n6, Mar. 31, 1994. cited by other
Assistant Examiner: Malhotra, Sanjeev
Primary Examiner: Trammell, James P
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
Accession Number: edspgr.07996311
Database: USPTO Patent Grants
More Details
Language:English