Water spray retort system suitable for paperboard packages
| Title: | Water spray retort system suitable for paperboard packages |
|---|---|
| Patent Number: | 7,104,465 |
| Publication Date: | September 12, 2006 |
| Appl. No: | 10/435491 |
| Application Filed: | May 09, 2003 |
| Abstract: | A retort is described for use with paperboard containers (48) to reduce moisture absorption during processing of foodstuffs therein. The improvement includes using solid cone spray nozzles (50) with spray angles in the range of about 100 degrees to about 115 degrees. In one embodiment, the distance (D′) between the nozzles and the container is in the range of about 70 mm to about 200 mm. In another embodiment, the flow rate if each nozzle (50) is reduced relative to known systems, while the total vessel flow rate is kept the same as per cubic meter load. Further, an overpressure may be added to the vessel via compressed air. In accordance with other aspects, an Impact reduction is used which relates nozzle flow rate, pressure, distance, etc. with moisture absorption in paperboard containers. |
| Inventors: | Persoons, Gustaaf (Brecht, BE); De Cock, Hans (Sint-Niklaas, BE); Roels, Marc (Sint-Niklaas, BE) |
| Assignees: | FMC Technologies, Inc. (Houston, TX, US) |
| Claim: | 1. In a retort vessel with at least one processing station and a processing method that includes spraying process fluid onto a container having a paperboard component at a given total flow rate and pressure, a method improvement comprising spraying processing fluid onto the paperboard and working at a flow rate and pressure calculated to have a minimal droplet impact on the containers using one or more nozzles producing a solid cone spray pattern at a spray angle in the range of about 100 to about 115 degrees. |
| Claim: | 2. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein the nozzles are located within the vessel to result in a minimum distance between the nozzles and the container of about 70 mm. |
| Claim: | 3. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein the distance between the container and nozzle is in the range of about 70 mm to about 200 mm. |
| Claim: | 4. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein there are at least four upper distribution pipes and corresponding nozzles at a processing station. |
| Claim: | 5. The method improvement according to claim 1 , further comprising at least one distribution pipe and a corresponding solid cone nozzle along the side of the container at a processing station. |
| Claim: | 6. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein each nozzle has a flow rate in the range of about 5.5 liters/mm to about 7 liters/mm. |
| Claim: | 7. The method improvement according to claim 6 , wherein the total flow rate of the retort is in the range of about 24 m3/hr to about 31 m3/hr, as per cubic meter load. |
| Claim: | 8. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein spray fluid is supplied to the nozzles at a pressure in the range of about 0.7 bar to about 1.5 bar. |
| Claim: | 9. The method improvement according to claim 1 , further comprising providing an overpressure to the vessel via compressed air. |
| Claim: | 10. The method improvement according to claim 9 , wherein providing an overpressure includes using one or more proportional compressed air and pressure relief valves. |
| Claim: | 11. The method improvement according to claim 1 , wherein the process fluid is water. |
| Claim: | 12. In a retort vessel with at least one processing station and a processing method that includes spraying process fluid onto a container at a given total flow rate and pressure; the container including a paperboard component; a method improvement comprising using one or more nozzles producing a solid cone spray pattern at a spray angle of about 80 degrees or greater resulting in a real impact value of about 0.00012 kg/cm 2 or less. |
| Claim: | 13. In a retort vessel with at least one processing station and a number of nozzles for spraying process fluid onto a stationary paperboard container at a given total flow rate and pressure, an improvement calculated to impose a minimal droplet impact on the container comprising at least one nozzle generating a solid cone spray pattern at a spray angle in the range of about 90 degrees or greater. |
| Claim: | 14. The improvement according to claim 13 , wherein the nozzle has a spray angle of in the range of about 100 degrees to about 115 degrees. |
| Claim: | 15. The improvement according to claim 13 , wherein the nozzles are located in the vessel to result in a distance between the container and the nozzles in the range of about 70 mm to about 200 mm. |
| Claim: | 16. The improvement according to claim 13 , wherein there are at least seven nozzles at a processing station, extending across the vessel. |
| Claim: | 17. The improvement according to claim 13 , wherein each nozzle has a flow rate in the range of about 5.5 liters/mm to about 7 liters/mm and the total flow rate of the retort is in the range of about 24 m 3 /hr to about 31 m 3 /hr, as per cubic meter load. |
| Claim: | 18. The improvement according to claim 13 , wherein spray fluid is supplied to the nozzles at a pressure in the range of about 0.7 bar to about 1.5 bar. |
| Claim: | 19. The improvement according to claim 13 , further comprising one or more compressed air valves to insert an overpressure into the vessel during processing. |
| Claim: | 20. In a retort vessel with at least one processing station and a processing method that includes spraying process fluid onto a container at a given total flow rate and pressure; the container including a paperboard component; a method improvement comprising using one or more solid cone nozzles having a spray angle in the range of about 100 to about 115 degrees and providing an overpressure to the vessel via compressed air. |
| Current U.S. Class: | 239/100 |
| Patent References Cited: | 2282187 May 1942 Herold et al. 3589611 June 1971 Jones, Jr. 4060914 December 1977 Hoffman 4221638 September 1980 Jones, Jr. 4371335 February 1983 Jones 4401051 August 1983 Gunther 4669667 June 1987 Perkins et al. 4738617 April 1988 Zimmerman 5561027 October 1996 Verlinden et al. 5664482 September 1997 Graham et al. 5685326 November 1997 Cord et al. |
| Primary Examiner: | Hwu, Davis |
| Attorney, Agent or Firm: | Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness pllc |
| Accession Number: | edspgr.07104465 |
| Database: | USPTO Patent Grants |
| Language: | English |
|---|