Comparative Efficacy of Finerenone versus Canagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparative Efficacy of Finerenone versus Canagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
Authors: David Cherney, Kerstin Folkerts, Paul Mernagh, Mateusz Nikodem, Joerg Pawlitschko, Peter Rossing, Neil Hawkins
Source: Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, Vol 12, Iss 3, Pp 169-180 (2024)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
LCC:Business
Subject Terms: chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), finerenone, canagliflozin, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Business, HF5001-6182
More Details: This study aimed to close an evidence gap concerning the relative efficacy of finerenone versus SGLT2is in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Canagliflozin was selected as a proxy for the SGLT2i class. Patient-level data of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of finerenone (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) were used alongside aggregated data from CREDENCE, an RCT of canagliflozin. To account for meaningful between-study heterogeneity between each finerenone trial and CREDENCE, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of a range of efficacy outcomes was undertaken for each finerenone study versus CREDENCE. These results were meta-analyzed, enabling the estimation of the relative effects of finerenone against canagliflozin. For the cardiorenal composite endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing finerenone to canagliflozin was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.36). The corresponding HRs for all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular death were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.34), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.55) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.64 to 1.37), respectively. The absence of statistically significant differences was consistent throughout the main analysis and a range of sensitivity analyses. Based on this study, using a large sample of data and adjusted for meaningful differences between the baseline characteristics of the included RCTs, there was no statistically significant evidence indicating a difference in the efficacy of finerenone compared to canagliflozin in the treatment of CKD in patients with T2D.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2001-6689
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2001-6689/12/3/14; https://doaj.org/toc/2001-6689
DOI: 10.3390/jmahp12030014
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/dff937541dc9404db1fe3b6590a96398
Accession Number: edsdoj.ff937541dc9404db1fe3b6590a96398
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:20016689
DOI:10.3390/jmahp12030014
Published in:Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
Language:English