Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework to optimize an intervention to increase COVID-19 testing for Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers: A study protocol

Bibliographic Details
Title: Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework to optimize an intervention to increase COVID-19 testing for Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers: A study protocol
Authors: Marya Gwadz, Charles M. Cleland, Maria Lizardo, Robert L. Hawkins, Greg Bangser, Lalitha Parameswaran, Victoria Stanhope, Jennifer A. Robinson, Shristi Karim, Tierra Hollaway, Paola G. Ramirez, Prema L. Filippone, Amanda S. Ritchie, Angela Banfield, Elizabeth Silverman
Source: BMC Public Health, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2022)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
Subject Terms: Multiphase optimization strategy, COVID-19, Testing, RADx-UP, Frontline workers, Essential workers, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
More Details: Abstract Background Among those at highest risk for COVID-19 exposure is the large population of frontline essential workers in occupations such food service, retail, personal care, and in-home health services, among whom Black and Latino/Hispanic persons are over-represented. For those not vaccinated and at risk for exposure to COVID-19, including frontline essential workers, regular (approximately weekly) COVID-19 testing is recommended. However, Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers in these occupations experience serious impediments to COVID-19 testing at individual/attitudinal- (e.g., lack of knowledge of guidelines), social- (e.g., social norms), and structural-levels of influence (e.g., poor access), and rates of testing for COVID-19 are insufficient. Methods/design The proposed community-engaged study uses the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework and an efficient factorial design to test four candidate behavioral intervention components informed by an integrated conceptual model that combines critical race theory, harm reduction, and self-determination theory. They are A) motivational interview counseling, B) text messaging grounded in behavioral economics, C) peer education, and D) access to testing (via navigation to an appointment vs. a self-test kit). All participants receive health education on COVID-19. The specific aims are to: identify which components contribute meaningfully to improvement in the primary outcome, COVID-19 testing confirmed with documentary evidence, with the most effective combination of components comprising an “optimized” intervention that strategically balances effectiveness against affordability, scalability, and efficiency (Aim 1); identify mediators and moderators of the effects of components (Aim 2); and use a mixed-methods approach to explore relationships among COVID-19 testing and vaccination (Aim 3). Participants will be N = 448 Black and Latino/Hispanic frontline essential workers not tested for COVID-19 in the past six months and not fully vaccinated for COVID-19, randomly assigned to one of 16 intervention conditions, and assessed at 6- and 12-weeks post-baseline. Last, N = 50 participants will engage in qualitative in-depth interviews. Discussion This optimization trial is designed to yield an effective, affordable, and efficient behavioral intervention that can be rapidly scaled in community settings. Further, it will advance the literature on intervention approaches for social inequities such as those evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05139927 ; Registered on 11/29/2021. Protocol version 1.0. May 2, 2022, Version 1.0
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1471-2458
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13576-0
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/f75240a4d547424eafefef090626aa89
Accession Number: edsdoj.f75240a4d547424eafefef090626aa89
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:14712458
DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13576-0
Published in:BMC Public Health
Language:English