High rate of uncovered struts in latest generation drug-eluting stents with durable, biodegradable polymer or lack of it 1 month after implantation

Bibliographic Details
Title: High rate of uncovered struts in latest generation drug-eluting stents with durable, biodegradable polymer or lack of it 1 month after implantation
Authors: Alicia Calvo-Fernández, Josep Gómez-Lara, Roberto Elosua, Xavier Durán, Héctor Cubero-Gallego, Helena Tizón-Marcos, Neus Salvatella, Alejandro Negrete, Raúl Millán, Consol Ivern, José Luis Díez, Andrea Sánchez-Carpintero, Núria Farré, José M. de la Torre Hernández, Beatriz Vaquerizo
Source: REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.), Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 20-28 (2023)
Publisher Information: Permanyer, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Medicine
Subject Terms: Optical coherence tomography, Drug-eluting stents, Endothelization, Apposition, Restenosis, Medicine
More Details: ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Delayed vascular healing may induce late stent thrombosis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is useful to evaluate endothelial coverage. The objective of this study was to compare stent coverage and apposition in non-complex coronary artery lesions treated with durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (durable-polymer EES) vs biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (biodegradable-polymer EES) vs polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents (BES) 1 and 6 months after stent implantation. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study that compared the 3 types of DES. Follow-up angiography and OCT were performed 1 and 6 months later. The primary endpoint was the rate of uncovered struts as assessed by the OCT at 1 month. Results: A total of 104 patients with de novo non-complex coronary artery lesions were enrolled. A total of 44 patients were treated with polymer-free BES, 35 with biodegradable-polymer EES, and 25 with durable-polymer EES. A high rate of uncovered struts was found at 1 month with no significant differences reported among the stents (80.2%, polymer-free BES; 88.1%, biodegradable-polymer EES; 82.5%, durable-polymer EES; P = .209). Coverage improved after 6 months in the 3 groups without significant differences being reported (97%, 95%, and 93.7%, respectively; P = .172). Conclusions: In patients with de novo non-complex coronary artery lesions treated with durable vs biodegradable vs polymer-free DES, strut coverage and apposition were suboptimal at 1 month with significant improvement at 6 months.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
Spanish; Castilian
ISSN: 2604-7322
Relation: https://recintervcardiol.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=993; https://doaj.org/toc/2604-7322
DOI: 10.24875/RECICE.M22000343
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/ef734c55979c4e0cb0ae83a79f84cd8c
Accession Number: edsdoj.f734c55979c4e0cb0ae83a79f84cd8c
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:26047322
DOI:10.24875/RECICE.M22000343
Published in:REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.)
Language:English
Spanish; Castilian