The feasibility of an online educational lifestyle program for people with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews

Bibliographic Details
Title: The feasibility of an online educational lifestyle program for people with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews
Authors: William Bevens, J Reece, PL Jelinek, TJ Weiland, N Nag, S Simpson-Yap, K Gray, GA Jelinek, SL Neate
Source: Digital Health, Vol 8 (2022)
Publisher Information: SAGE Publishing, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
Subject Terms: Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7
More Details: Objective To explore the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a multiple sclerosis online course (MSOC) via qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews. Methods The MSOC was developed in two arms: intervention arm which contained evidence-based lifestyle modification recommendations, and standard-care arm which delivered information from MS websites reflecting standard advice. Participants were recruited via online advertisements, completed a baseline questionnaire, and randomised. Seven modules were delivered over six weeks. Course completers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Within a qualitative paradigm, interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Fourteen of the 17 course completers were interviewed: 86% (12/14) female; mean age 50 years; residing in Australia, New Zealand, and the USA, predominantly had relapsing-remitting MS, mean time from diagnosis 9.5 years, and patient-determined disease steps disability assessment distributed evenly across all three categories. Four themes were identified: 1) “Hearing our stories” (hope for the future, feeling represented, exploring the journey of others with MS, learning from diversity, and wanting to connect with others); 2) “Taking the plunge” (not wanting to be first, feelings of nervousness or reluctance and feeling confronted); 3) “The accessibility and safety of being online” (ease of access, going at your own pace, making it work and not letting others down); and 4) “unpacking the course” (ease of navigation, visuals, understandability, and length and timing). Conclusion Participants felt represented, found the course accessible and content was easy to understand. These experiences provide important insights and considerations for this digital health intervention.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2055-2076
20552076
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2055-2076
DOI: 10.1177/20552076221123713
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/ef41d59bee3e470fa0160cc6473e7117
Accession Number: edsdoj.f41d59bee3e470fa0160cc6473e7117
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:20552076
DOI:10.1177/20552076221123713
Published in:Digital Health
Language:English