Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence: Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps

Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence: Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps
Authors: Yuya Hiratsuka, Takashi Hisabe, Kensei Ohtsu, Tatsuhisa Yasaka, Kazuhiro Takeda, Masaki Miyaoka, Yoichiro Ono, Takao Kanemitsu, Kentaro Imamura, Teruyuki Takeda, Satoshi Nimura, Kenshi Yao
Source: Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 79-87 (2025)
Publisher Information: The Japan Society of Coloproctology, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
Subject Terms: artificial intelligence, computer-aided detection, adenoma miss rate, adenoma detection rate, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869
More Details: Objectives: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for screening cancer and precancerous lesions in the large intestine. Recently, remarkable advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various computer-aided detection (CADe) systems for colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of AI for colonoscopy using CAD-EYEⓇ (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) to calculate the adenoma miss rate (AMR). Methods: This randomized, open-label, single-center, tandem study was conducted at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital from February 2022 to November 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to the CADe or non-CADe group. Immediately after the completion of the first endoscopy by an endoscopist, a new endoscopist was assigned to perform the second endoscopy. As a result, different endoscopists performed the examinations in a tandem fashion. A missed lesion was defined as a newly detected colorectal polyp by the second endoscopy. Finally, the AMR was compared between the two groups. Results: The study population comprised 48 patients in the CADe group and 46 patients in the non-CADe group. The AMR was 17.4% in the CADe group and 30.3% in the non-CADe group. Therefore, the AMR in the CADe group was statistically significantly lower than that in the non-CADe group (P=0.009). Conclusions: The application of CAD-EYEⓇ to colonoscopy reduced the AMR. Overall, CAD-EYEⓇ might be useful for reducing missed colorectal adenomas.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2432-3853
Relation: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-057/_pdf/-char/en; https://doaj.org/toc/2432-3853
DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2024-057
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/df3c0afc9be24b81b9f4ef293204c483
Accession Number: edsdoj.f3c0afc9be24b81b9f4ef293204c483
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:24323853
DOI:10.23922/jarc.2024-057
Published in:Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
Language:English