Developing research priorities for palliative care in Colombia: a priority setting partnership approach

Bibliographic Details
Title: Developing research priorities for palliative care in Colombia: a priority setting partnership approach
Authors: Tracey McConnell, Cindy V. Mendieta, Esther de Vries, Jose A. Calvache, Gillian Prue, Sam Ahmedzai, Joanne Reid
Source: BMC Palliative Care, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2024)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Special situations and conditions
Subject Terms: Palliative care, Research priorities, Nominal group technique, Priority setting partnership, Consensus methods, Special situations and conditions, RC952-1245
More Details: Abstract Background A recent Lancet commission called for more research on palliative care in low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries such as Colombia. A research priority setting approach has been recommended by The Global Forum for Health Research to address the huge gap in research output between LMIC and high-income countries, with influential health service bodies recommending the active involvement of non-research expert stakeholders in establishing research priorities to address service user needs. Method Priority setting partnership (PSP) following the four stages of the James Lind Alliance methodology; establishing the partnership, identifying evidence uncertainties, refining questions and uncertainties, and prioritization. Data from MS forms were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 33 stakeholders attended an online PSP workshop and completed the Mentimeter exercise in Microsoft Teams. A total of 48 attended the subsequent in person prioritisation exercise in urban Bogota (n = 22) and rural Popayan (n = 25). The stakeholders were a diverse group of health professionals (physicians, medical students, nurses, dentists, physiotherapists, nutritionist, occupational and speech therapists), financial and administrative staff and patients with life-limiting illness and caregivers. Top research priorities included patient and caregiver needs, service provider education and training, and better integration of palliative care with cancer and non-cancer services. The key challenges included a lack of interest in palliative care research, along with funding, time and resource constraints. Key solutions included collaboration across disciplines and settings, highlighting benefits of palliative research to help secure adequate resources, and multicentre, mixed method research, with patient involvement from the research development stage. Conclusion The findings of this PSP should be disseminated among palliative care associations worldwide to inform international multicentre studies, and among governmental and nongovernmental organisations that promote research in Colombia. A focus on patient and family caregiver palliative care needs in Colombia should be prioritised.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1472-684X
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1472-684X
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01534-z
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/bc5915e02a6e483593393ee2cbe6658e
Accession Number: edsdoj.bc5915e02a6e483593393ee2cbe6658e
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:1472684X
DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01534-z
Published in:BMC Palliative Care
Language:English