Comparing the clinical significance and antigen specificity of insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2 autoantibodies between radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparing the clinical significance and antigen specificity of insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2 autoantibodies between radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes
Authors: Eiji Kawasaki, Akira Shimada, Akihisa Imagawa, Norio Abiru, Takuya Awata, Yoichi Oikawa, Haruhiko Osawa, Yumiko Kawabata, Junji Kozawa, Tetsuro Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Daisuke Chujo, Tomoyasu Fukui, Junnosuke Miura, Kazuki Yasuda, Hisafumi Yasuda, Hiroshi Kajio, Toshiaki Hanafusa, Hiroshi Ikegami, the Committee of type 1 diabetes, Japan Diabetes Society
Source: Journal of Diabetes Investigation, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 58-66 (2023)
Publisher Information: Wiley, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
Subject Terms: Autoantibodies, Autoantigen, Insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2, Type 1 diabetes, Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology, RC648-665
More Details: Abstract Aims/Introduction This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance and antigen specificity of autoantibodies to insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2 (IA‐2A) by radioimmunoassay (RIA; IA‐2A‐RIA) and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; IA‐2A‐ELISA) in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. Materials and Methods A total of 338 type 1 diabetic patients were enrolled, including 38 fulminant type 1 diabetes, 168 acute‐onset type 1 diabetes and 137 slowly‐progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM). The concordance, correlation of autoantibody titer, and the relationship between IA‐2A and progression to the insulin‐deficient state were examined. Also, competitive assay was used to examine the antigen specificity. Results The prevalence of IA‐2A‐ELISA was 4–5% lower than that of IA‐2A‐RIA in both the acute‐onset type 1 diabetes and SPIDDM, but the diagnostic sensitivities of both subtypes, when measured in combination with glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody, were comparable. The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes using either the RIA or ELISA methods showed substantial agreement with the exponential correlation of autoantibody titers detected by RIA and ELISA. Among the SPIDDM patients, the fasting C‐peptide for IA‐2A‐positive cases by ELISA, but not the RIA method, was significantly lower than in the negative cases (P
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2040-1124
2040-1116
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2040-1116; https://doaj.org/toc/2040-1124
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13910
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/b5d09b3b2ef946e3ad57d361fe587d35
Accession Number: edsdoj.b5d09b3b2ef946e3ad57d361fe587d35
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:20401124
20401116
DOI:10.1111/jdi.13910
Published in:Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Language:English