Species distribution modelling using MaxEnt: overview and prospects
| Title: | Species distribution modelling using MaxEnt: overview and prospects |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Yuliia Novoseltseva |
| Source: | Theriologia Ukrainica, Vol 28, Pp 102-112 (2024) |
| Publisher Information: | National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. National Museum of Natural History, 2024. |
| Publication Year: | 2024 |
| Collection: | LCC:Zoology |
| Subject Terms: | maxent model, geographic range analysis, environmental factors, Zoology, QL1-991 |
| More Details: | Niche modeling of species has become increasingly important in the context of accelerating climate change and anthropogenic impacts on the biosphere. One such tool for predicting the potential distribution of species is the maximum entropy method (MaxEnt). This method is particularly valuable when working with biodiversity data collected from herbaria and museum collections, as such data typically only contains information about where a species has been recorded, rather than where it is absent. It is precisely this feature of MaxEnt that makes it an indispensable tool for biodiversity research based on historical data. This allows for the reconstruction of historical species ranges, the detection of changes in their distribution, and the forecasting of future trends, namely the prediction of potential ranges, the assessment of the impact of climate change and anthropogenic pressure, and the development of effective biodiversity conservation strategies. This article provides a brief overview of the MaxEnt program's operating principle, its capabilities, and limitations. In particular, it analyzes the impact of data quality on modeling results and considers various approaches to assessing the importance of ecological factors for species distribution. One of the key issues discussed in the article is the problem of sampling bias. Sampling bias arises because data on the presence of species are often collected non-randomly and depend on the accessibility of the locality, the interests of researchers, and other factors. This can lead to distortions in modeling results. Various methods can be used to correct these biases, such as the bias grid method and the background points method. Another important aspect is the choice of the territory for the background sample. It should be taken into account that when using projections where cells have different areas, MaxEnt may give incorrect results. The article also emphasizes the need for cautious interpretation of modeling results. Assessing niche models solely based on AUC can be misleading, therefore, for a more reliable assessment of variable importance, it is worth supplementing it with permutation importance and the jackknife method. Examples of modeling for various groups, including mammals of the Ukrainian fauna, were considered. |
| Document Type: | article |
| File Description: | electronic resource |
| Language: | English Ukrainian |
| ISSN: | 2616-7379 2617-1120 |
| Relation: | http://terioshkola.org.ua/library/pts28/TU2809-novoseltseva.htm; https://doaj.org/toc/2616-7379; https://doaj.org/toc/2617-1120 |
| DOI: | 10.53452/TU2809 |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/b2644b23e94c4ce59a5b0993ccf529c5 |
| Accession Number: | edsdoj.b2644b23e94c4ce59a5b0993ccf529c5 |
| Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| ISSN: | 26167379 26171120 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.53452/TU2809 |
| Published in: | Theriologia Ukrainica |
| Language: | English Ukrainian |