Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Intercomparison of Ocean Color Algorithms for Picophytoplankton Carbon in the Ocean |
| Authors: |
Víctor Martínez-Vicente, Hayley Evers-King, Shovonlal Roy, Tihomir S. Kostadinov, Glen A. Tarran, Jason R. Graff, Robert J. W. Brewin, Giorgio Dall'Olmo, Tom Jackson, Anna E. Hickman, Rüdiger Röttgers, Hajo Krasemann, Emilio Marañón, Trevor Platt, Shubha Sathyendranath |
| Source: |
Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol 4 (2017) |
| Publisher Information: |
Frontiers Media S.A., 2017. |
| Publication Year: |
2017 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Science
LCC:General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution |
| Subject Terms: |
phytoplankton carbon, carbon-to-chlorophyll, ocean color remote sensing, picophytoplankton, flow cytometry, optical water class, Science, General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution, QH1-199.5 |
| More Details: |
The differences among phytoplankton carbon (Cphy) predictions from six ocean color algorithms are investigated by comparison with in situ estimates of phytoplankton carbon. The common satellite data used as input for the algorithms is the Ocean Color Climate Change Initiative merged product. The matching in situ data are derived from flow cytometric cell counts and per-cell carbon estimates for different types of pico-phytoplankton. This combination of satellite and in situ data provides a relatively large matching dataset (N > 500), which is independent from most of the algorithms tested and spans almost two orders of magnitude in Cphy. Results show that not a single algorithm outperforms any of the other when using all matching data. Concentrating on the oligotrophic regions (Chlorophyll-a concentration, B, less than 0.15 mg Chl m−3), where flow cytometric analysis captures most of the phytoplankton biomass, reveals significant differences in algorithm performance. The bias ranges from −35 to +150% and unbiased root mean squared difference from 5 to 10 mg C m−3 among algorithms, with chlorophyll-based algorithms performing better than the rest. The backscattering-based algorithms produce different results at the clearest waters and these differences are discussed in terms of the different algorithms used for optical particle backscattering coefficient (bbp) retrieval. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
2296-7745 |
| Relation: |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00378/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2296-7745 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fmars.2017.00378 |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/b10a52f04226457fa4b39a65f00652a3 |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.b10a52f04226457fa4b39a65f00652a3 |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
