Why? What? How? Using an Intervention Mapping approach to develop a personalised intervention to improve adherence to photoprotection in patients with Xeroderma Pigmentosum
| Title: | Why? What? How? Using an Intervention Mapping approach to develop a personalised intervention to improve adherence to photoprotection in patients with Xeroderma Pigmentosum |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jessica Walburn, Kirby Sainsbury, Lesley Foster, John Weinman, Myfanwy Morgan, Sam Norton, Martha Canfield, Paul Chadwick, Bob Sarkany, Vera Araújo-Soares |
| Source: | Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 475-500 (2020) |
| Publisher Information: | Taylor & Francis Group, 2020. |
| Publication Year: | 2020 |
| Collection: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Psychology |
| Subject Terms: | photoprotection, adherence, intervention mapping, behaviour change, xeroderma pigmentosum, Medicine, Psychology, BF1-990 |
| More Details: | Background: Intervention Mapping (IM) is a systematic approach for developing theory-based interventions across a variety of contexts and settings. This paper describes the development of a complex intervention designed to reduce the dose of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) reaching the face of adults with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP), by improving photoprotection. XP is a genetic condition that without extreme UVR photoprotection, leads to high risk of developing skin cancer. Methods: The IM protocol of 6 steps was applied, involving comprehensive mixed-methods formative research. Key stakeholders (XP clinical staff and Patient and Public Involvement Panel), were instrumental at every step. Behaviour change methods were informed by the IM taxonomy, therapeutic approaches (e.g. ACT, CBT) and coded according to the taxonomy of behaviour change techniques (version 1). Results: We designed a personalised modular intervention to target psychosocial determinants of photoprotective activities that influence the amount of UVR reaching the face. Content was developed to target determinants of motivation to protect and factors preventing the enactment of behaviours. Participants received personalised content addressing determinants/barriers most relevant to them, as well as core ‘behaviour-change’ material, considered important for all (e.g. SMART goals). Core and personalised content was delivered via 7 one-to-one sessions with a trained facilitator using a manual and purpose designed materials: Magazine; text messages; sunscreen application video; goal-setting tools (e.g. UVR dial and face protection guide); activity sheets. Novel features included use of ACT-based values to enhance intrinsic motivation, targeting of emotional barriers to photoprotection, addressing appearance concerns and facilitating habit formation. Conclusion: IM was an effective approach for complex intervention design. The structure (e.g. use of matrices) tethered the intervention tightly to theory and evidence-based approaches. The significant amount of time required needs to be considered and may hinder translation of IM into clinical and non-academic settings. |
| Document Type: | article |
| File Description: | electronic resource |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 2164-2850 21642850 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/2164-2850 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/21642850.2020.1819287 |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/9e310e5396eb439f8111258fa88c45a1 |
| Accession Number: | edsdoj.9e310e5396eb439f8111258fa88c45a1 |
| Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| ISSN: | 21642850 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1080/21642850.2020.1819287 |
| Published in: | Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine |
| Language: | English |