ChEVAR technique for emergent aneurysm repair - a retrospective case series

Bibliographic Details
Title: ChEVAR technique for emergent aneurysm repair - a retrospective case series
Authors: Carlos Veterano, Pedro Sá Pinto, Carlos Pereira, Joana Martins, Daniel A. Mendes, Henrique Rocha, Andreia Pinelo, Rui Machado
Source: Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Vol 19, Iss 3 (2023)
Publisher Information: Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
Subject Terms: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Aneurysm, Ruptured, Endovascular Aneurysm Repair, Chimney, Parallel stents, Medicine, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701
More Details: INTRODUCTION: Chimney EVAR (ChEVAR) for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been largely relegated for when fenestrated endografts are unavailable, especially due to durability concerns. However, the off-the-shelf nature of ChEVAR makes it a good option for emergent AAA repair. We report our institutional experience in ChEVAR in an urgent setting. METHODS: ChEVAR procedures were collected from 2019 to 2023 in a tertiary hospital, and a retrospective analysis was performed. This includes gathered information from electronic medical records, surgical reports and the picture archiving system. Descriptive statistics were applied. The main endpoints were technical success, 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS: Five patients were submitted to urgent aneurysm repair using the chEVAR technique. Average age was 73,4 years and all patients were male. Arterial hypertension was present in 100% patients and all patients were ASA 4. Indications for surgery were post EVAR type 1a endoleak with associated rupture or abdominal pain in two patients; symptomatic/contained rupture of pararenal AAA in two patients; and contained rupture of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm in one patient. A total of eight target vessels were catheterized: two patients required single-vessel chimney and the remainder two-vessel chimney. Target vessels were two superior mesenteric arteries and six renal arteries. Technical success rate was 100% and 30-day mortality was 0%. There were no major complications. Follow-up time is 20.2 months (4.7-38). Target vessel patency during the follow-up period was 87.5%. Three patients (60%) died due to non-aortic related pathologies, on average 18 months after surgery (4.7-38), with a 1-year survival of 80%. CONCLUSION: Our experience with ChEVAR for emergent AAA repair is satisfactory, with high technical success rates and low short-term mortality. Sac regression, low rates of target vessel occlusion and type 1a endoleaks reveal a favourable profile for aneurysm exclusion. ChEVAR is a viable option in emergent setting for patients unfit for open repair.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: Portuguese
ISSN: 1646-706X
2183-0096
Relation: https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/578; https://doaj.org/toc/1646-706X; https://doaj.org/toc/2183-0096
DOI: 10.48750/acv.578
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/99b981379c614575a4e0f08c30f16aed
Accession Number: edsdoj.99b981379c614575a4e0f08c30f16aed
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:1646706X
21830096
DOI:10.48750/acv.578
Published in:Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
Language:Portuguese