Evaluation of the Effect of Decision Support on the Efficiency of Primary Care Providers in the Outpatient Practice

Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluation of the Effect of Decision Support on the Efficiency of Primary Care Providers in the Outpatient Practice
Authors: Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Ronald A. Hankey, Lindsay K. Decker, Stephen S. Cha, Robert A. Greenes, Hongfang Liu, Rajeev Chaudhry
Source: Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Vol 6 (2015)
Publisher Information: SAGE Publishing, 2015.
Publication Year: 2015
Collection: LCC:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
LCC:Public aspects of medicine
Subject Terms: Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
More Details: Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) for primary care has been shown to improve delivery of preventive services. However, there is little evidence for efficiency of physicians due to CDS assistance. In this article, we report a pilot study for measuring the impact of CDS on the time spent by physicians for deciding on preventive services and chronic disease management. Methods: We randomly selected 30 patients from a primary care practice, and assigned them to 10 physicians. The physicians were requested to perform chart review to decide on preventive services and chronic disease management for the assigned patients. The patients assignment was done in a randomized crossover design, such that each patient received 2 sets of recommendations—one from a physician with CDS assistance and the other from a different physician without CDS assistance. We compared the physician recommendations made using CDS assistance, with the recommendations made without CDS assistance. Results: The physicians required an average of 1 minute 44 seconds, when they were they had access to the decision support system and 5 minutes when they were unassisted. Hence the CDS assistance resulted in an estimated saving of 3 minutes 16 seconds (65%) of the physicians’ time, which was statistically significant ( P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of recommendations. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CDS assistance significantly reduced the time spent by physicians for deciding on preventive services and chronic disease management. The result needs to be confirmed by performing similar studies at other institutions.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2150-1319
2150-1327
21501319
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2150-1319; https://doaj.org/toc/2150-1327
DOI: 10.1177/2150131914546325
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/93bd5b7fcd15422eabb658e63c6142ed
Accession Number: edsdoj.93bd5b7fcd15422eabb658e63c6142ed
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:21501319
21501327
DOI:10.1177/2150131914546325
Published in:Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Language:English