Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Effectiveness of a facilitation programme using a mobile application for initiating advance care planning discussions between patients with advanced cancer and healthcare providers: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (J-SUPPORT 2104) |
| Authors: |
Tatsuo Akechi, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Naomi Sakurai, Tempei Miyaji, Yosuke Uchitomi, Narikazu Boku, Maiko Fujimori, Taro Ueno, Shunsuke Oyamada, Masanori Mori, Ayumi Okizaki, Kyoko Obama, Masako Okamura, Midori Kadowaki |
| Source: |
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 3 (2023) |
| Publisher Information: |
BMJ Publishing Group, 2023. |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Medicine |
| Subject Terms: |
Medicine |
| More Details: |
Introduction Timely implementation of the discussion process of advance care planning (ACP) is recommended. The communication attitude of healthcare providers is critical in ACP facilitation; thus, improving their communication attitudes may reduce patient distress and unnecessary aggressive treatment while enhancing care satisfaction. Digital mobile devices are being developed for behavioural interventions owing to their low space and time restrictions and ease of information sharing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention programme using an application intended to facilitate patient questioning behaviour on improving communication related to ACP between patients with advanced cancer and healthcare providers.Methods and analysis This study uses a parallel-group, evaluator-blind, randomised controlled trial design. We plan to recruit 264 adult patients with incurable advanced cancer at the National Cancer Centre in Tokyo, Japan. Intervention group participants use a mobile application ACP programme and undergo a 30 min interview with a trained intervention provider for discussions with the oncologist at the next patient visit, while control group participants continue their usual treatment. The primary outcome is the oncologist’s communication behaviour score assessed using audiorecordings of the consultation. Secondary outcomes include communication between patients and oncologists and the patients’ distress, quality of life, care goals and preferences, and medical care utilisation. We will use a full analysis set including the registered participant population who receive at least a part of the intervention.Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Japan Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Oncology Group (Registration No. 2104) and the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Centre Hospital (registration No. 2020-500). Written informed consent is obtained from the patients. The results of the trial will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings.Trial registration numbers UMIN000045305, NCT05045040. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
2044-6055 |
| Relation: |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/3/e069557.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055 |
| DOI: |
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069557 |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/8527325bfe87410c84587dfcf485985a |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.8527325bfe87410c84587dfcf485985a |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
