| Title: |
Relevant Journals for Identifying Implementation Science Articles: Results of an International Implementation Science Expert Survey |
| Authors: |
Juliane Mielke, Thekla Brunkert, Leah L. Zullig, Hayden B. Bosworth, Mieke Deschodt, Michael Simon, Sabina De Geest |
| Source: |
Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 9 (2021) |
| Publisher Information: |
Frontiers Media S.A., 2021. |
| Publication Year: |
2021 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Public aspects of medicine |
| Subject Terms: |
implementation science, implementation science journals, survey, literature review, translational research, dissemination, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270 |
| More Details: |
In implementation science (IS), conducting well-targeted and reproducible literature searches is challenging due to non-specific and varying terminology that is fragmented over multiple disciplines. A list of journals that publish IS-relevant content for use in search strings can support this process. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 56 Australian, European, and North American IS experts to identify and prioritize relevant journals that publish IS articles. Journals' relevance was assessed by providing each with a list of 12 journals, to which they were encouraged to add additional journal names and comments as free text. We also assessed which journals had published special IS-focused issues—identified via PubMed and Google searches—over the last 20 years. Data were analyzed descriptively. Between February 28 and March 15, 2020, a purposive sample of 34/56 experts participated in the survey (response rate: 60.7%). Implementation Science and BMC Health Services Research were perceived as relevant by 97.1% of participants; other journals' relevance varied internationally. Experts proposed 50 additional journals from various clinical fields and health science disciplines. We identified 12 calls and 53 special issues on IS published within various journals and research fields. Experts' comments confirmed the described challenges in identifying IS literature. This report presents experts' ratings of IS journals, which can be included in strategies supporting searches of IS evidence. However, challenges in identifying IS evidence remain geographically and interdisciplinary. Further investment is needed to develop reproducible search strings to capture IS evidence as an important step in improving IS research quality. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
2296-2565 |
| Relation: |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.639192/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fpubh.2021.639192 |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/ec8298045c0d4df383cd437ad44dee35 |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.8298045c0d4df383cd437ad44dee35 |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
