Simulation-based assessment of robotic cardiac surgery skills: An international multicenter, cross-specialty trialCentral MessagePerspective

Bibliographic Details
Title: Simulation-based assessment of robotic cardiac surgery skills: An international multicenter, cross-specialty trialCentral MessagePerspective
Authors: Gennady V. Atroshchenko, MD, Emiliano Navarra, MD, Matthew Valdis, MD, MSc, FRCS, Elena Sandoval, MD, Nasseh Hashemi, MD, Stepan Cerny, MD, Daniel Pereda, MD, PhD, Meindert Palmen, MD, PhD, Flemming Bjerrum, MD, PhD, Niels Henrik Bruun, MSc, Martin G. Tolsgaard, MD, DMSc, PhD
Source: JTCVS Open, Vol 16, Iss , Pp 619-627 (2023)
Publisher Information: Elsevier, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
LCC:Surgery
Subject Terms: robotic cardiac surgery, assessment, validity, wet lab, simulation, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701, Surgery, RD1-811
More Details: Objective: This study aimed to investigate the validity of simulation-based assessment of robotic-assisted cardiac surgery skills using a wet lab model, focusing on the use of a time-based score (TBS) and modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (mGEARS) score. Methods: We tested 3 wet lab tasks (atrial closure, mitral annular stitches, and internal thoracic artery [ITA] dissection) with both experienced robotic cardiac surgeons and novices from multiple European centers. The tasks were assessed using 2 tools: TBS and mGEARS score. Reliability, internal consistency, and the ability to discriminate between different levels of competence were evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated a high internal consistency for all 3 tasks using mGEARS assessment tool. The mGEARS score and TBS could reliably discriminate between different levels of competence for the atrial closure and mitral stitches tasks but not for the ITA harvesting task. A generalizability study also revealed that it was feasible to assess competency of the atrial closure and mitral stitches tasks using mGEARS but not the ITA dissection task. Pass/fail scores were established for each task using both TBS and mGEARS assessment tools. Conclusions: The study provides sufficient evidence for using TBS and mGEARS scores in evaluating robotic-assisted cardiac surgery skills in wet lab settings for intracardiac tasks. Combining both assessment tools enhances the evaluation of proficiency in robotic cardiac surgery, paving the way for standardized, evidence-based preclinical training and credentialing. Clinical trial registry number: NCT05043064.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2666-2736
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623003479; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-2736
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.029
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/8113406ae0744498aa8645ab97958762
Accession Number: edsdoj.8113406ae0744498aa8645ab97958762
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:26662736
DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.029
Published in:JTCVS Open
Language:English