Comparative safety and efficacy of tibolone and escitalopram in postmenopausal women

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparative safety and efficacy of tibolone and escitalopram in postmenopausal women
Authors: Rajnish Raj, Namita Sharma, Rohit Garg, Ekram Goyal
Source: Industrial Psychiatry Journal, Vol 30, Iss 3, Pp 140-148 (2021)
Publisher Information: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: LCC:Psychiatry
LCC:Industrial psychology
Subject Terms: anxiety, postmenopausal depression, tibolone, Psychiatry, RC435-571, Industrial psychology, HF5548.7-5548.85
More Details: Background: A high prevalence of psychiatric disorders, particularly depressive and anxiety disorders among women is observed through the postmenopausal stage. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of tibolone (TIB) and escitalopram (ESCIT) in postmenopausal women (PMW). Materials and Methods: It was an interventional, open-label, hospital-based, follow-up study conducted on 60 PMW with the diagnosis of depression as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-5 criteria. Patients were divided into two groups of 30 each, i.e. Group I (TIB-2.5 mg/day) and Group II (ESCIT-10–20 mg/day). The primary outcome was assessed for change in climacteric symptom scores on Greene's Climacteric Scale (GCS), severity of depression and anxiety on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and sexual functioning on Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX). The secondary outcome of well-being was assessed on World Health Organization Quality of life (QOL)-BREF. All the observations were carried out from baseline and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Both the groups showed significant improvement in climacteric and depressive symptoms. However, at the 8th and 12th weeks, mean ± standard deviation scores were significantly lower in Group I (GCS score - 24.80 ± 4.92, 20.30 ± 3.56; HAM-D score - 16.57 ± 5.83, 10.2 ± 5.67) compared to Group II (GCS score - 27.27 ± 5.83 and 23.33 ± 5.70, HAM-D score - 19.97 ± 7.98 and 16.17 ± 10.11). No significant difference between the groups was seen for anxiety on HAM-A scores. Only in Group I, there was significant improvement in ASEX scores. QoL in Group I had shown significant improvement in physical and psychological domain compared to Group II at different time interval, i.e. 4th and 8th week onward. In Group I, Alternative Dispute Resolution was reported to be 23.3%, whereas it was 56.7% in Group II. However, none were serious to warrant discontinuation. Conclusion: TIB was better than ESCIT in improving depression, climacteric symptoms, and physical and psychological domain of QoL with an additional benefit of restoring sexual functioning.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 0972-6748
0976-2795
Relation: http://www.industrialpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0972-6748;year=2021;volume=30;issue=3;spage=140;epage=148;aulast=Raj; https://doaj.org/toc/0972-6748; https://doaj.org/toc/0976-2795
DOI: 10.4103/0972-6748.328805
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/a7ec4558514f42bdbddf7e513914ad57
Accession Number: edsdoj.7ec4558514f42bdbddf7e513914ad57
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:09726748
09762795
DOI:10.4103/0972-6748.328805
Published in:Industrial Psychiatry Journal
Language:English