From a false sense of safety to resilience under uncertainty

Bibliographic Details
Title: From a false sense of safety to resilience under uncertainty
Authors: Matti T. J. Heino, Daniele Proverbio, Kaisa Saurio, Alexander Siegenfeld, Nelli Hankonen
Source: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 15 (2024)
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Psychology
Subject Terms: complex systems, attractor landscapes, safety, security, myth of mass panic, behavior change, Psychology, BF1-990
More Details: Understanding and acting upon risk is notably challenging, and navigating complexity with understandings developed for stable environments may inadvertently build a false sense of safety. Neglecting the potential for non-linear change or “black swan” events – highly impactful but uncommon occurrences – may lead to naive optimisation under assumed stability, exposing systems to extreme risks. For instance, loss aversion is seen as a cognitive bias in stable environments, but it can be an evolutionarily advantageous heuristic when complete destruction is possible. This paper advocates for better accounting of non-linear change in decision-making by leveraging insights from complex systems and psychological sciences, which help to identify blindspots in conventional decision-making and to develop risk mitigation plans that are interpreted contextually. In particular, we propose a framework using attractor landscapes to visualize and interpret complex system dynamics. In this context, attractors are states toward which systems naturally evolve, while tipping points – critical thresholds between attractors – can lead to profound, unexpected changes impacting a system’s resilience and well-being. We present four generic attractor landscape types that provide a novel lens for viewing risks and opportunities, and serve as decision-making contexts. The main practical contribution is clarifying when to emphasize particular strategies – optimisation, risk mitigation, exploration, or stabilization – within this framework. Context-appropriate decision making should enhance system resilience and mitigate extreme risks.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1664-1078
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346542/full; https://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346542
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/cd7c3b060f91467e9f7512584886ea32
Accession Number: edsdoj.7c3b060f91467e9f7512584886ea32
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:16641078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346542
Published in:Frontiers in Psychology
Language:English