Differences in medical care satisfaction of patients with 'functional' vs 'organic' esophageal diseases, Italian validation of the PPRS SF questionnaire

Bibliographic Details
Title: Differences in medical care satisfaction of patients with 'functional' vs 'organic' esophageal diseases, Italian validation of the PPRS SF questionnaire
Authors: Carlo Soldaini, Antonella Santonicola, Luigi Ruggiero, Angela Caloro, Luca De Leo, Nadia Pallotta, Paola Iovino
Source: Scientific Reports, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2025)
Publisher Information: Nature Portfolio, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Science
Subject Terms: Patient-Physician relationship scale, Eosinophilic esophagitis, Achalasia, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Esophageal disorders of gut-brain interaction, Medicine, Science
More Details: Abstract Patient-physician relationship (PPR) plays a key role in modern healthcare, especially within gastrointestinal medical practice. In 2017 Kurlander et al. developed a Patient-Physician-Relationship-Scale (PPRS), a questionnaire used to assess the patients’ medical care-satisfaction. The PPRS was later simplified by Drossman et al. in 2021 by creating a PPRS-SF (short form). This study aimed to validate the PPRS-SF in Italian and to administer it to patients with “functional” and “organic” esophageal diseases, to highlight the differences in the PPR between the two categories. The process of validation was carried out following a standardized forward-backward procedure and each step was overseen by a Rome foundation independent clinical monitor. The Italian version of the PPRS-SF was then administered to 50 Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), 53 Achalasia, 48 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and 44 esophageal disorders of gut brain interaction (eDGBI) patients. In eDGBI and GERD, the degree of patients’ satisfaction was significantly lower. Between a score of -36 and + 36, the mean score for patients with EoE was 30.20 (± 9.78), for Achalasia 23.78 (± 19.9); for GERD 20.46 (± 16.03) and for esophageal DGBI 17.91 (± 18.41). Moreover, there was a negative significant correlation between the PPR and age (R=- 0.208). This study validated the Italian version of the PPRS-SF questionnaire and showed that the patients’ diagnosis together with other factors such as their age, can affect the PPR. In particular, patients with DGBI and older patients reported lower scores than the ones with organic diseases and the younger ones, respectively.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2045-2322
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93576-3
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/79e791cae40f4be18ed046410e591935
Accession Number: edsdoj.79e791cae40f4be18ed046410e591935
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:20452322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-93576-3
Published in:Scientific Reports
Language:English