Efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Bibliographic Details
Title: Efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
Authors: Afaf A. M. Shaheen, Maha F. Algabbani, Manar M. Alshahrani, Fatimah A. Z. Alshahrani, Hana I. Alsobayel, Mohammed Taher Ahmed Omar, Abdulrahman M. Alsubiheen
Source: Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy, Vol 30, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2025)
Publisher Information: SpringerOpen, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Miscellaneous systems and treatments
Subject Terms: Total knee replacement, Total knee arthroplasty, Virtual reality, Augmented, Exergaming, Video games, Miscellaneous systems and treatments, RZ409.7-999
More Details: Abstract Objective To determine whether VR-based rehabilitation (VRBR) reduced pain and improved balance, proprioception, joint function, gait speed, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following Total knee replacement (TKR). Methods The Cochrane, MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they were in English, participants aged ≥ 18 years, underwent a unilateral or bilateral TKR and were treated using VRBR. Non-randomized studies, ununified outcomes, and RCTs with incomplete data were excluded. The methodological quality and Risk of Bias were assessed using the PEDro scale and Cochrane Collaboration tool respectively. The overall effect was estimated using Cohen’s standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Fifteen RCTs with 1,046 participants were included in the systematic review; 13 RCTs with 11 outcome measures were included in the meta-analysis. VRBR significantly reduced pain (SEM: − 0.36, 95% CI: − 0.73 to 0.00, P = .05), improved dynamic balance (SMD: − 0.75, 95% CI: − 1.32 to − 0.19, P = .009), and knee function (SMD: − 0.75; 95% CI: − 1.05 to 0.13, P .05). Conclusion Immersive and non-immersive VRBR are effective following TKR. The effect on pain and function may be sustained over three or six months. For proprioception, gait speed, and HRQOL, VRBR is not superior to conventional therapy.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2536-9660
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2536-9660
DOI: 10.1186/s43161-024-00246-y
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/7394ba6f7c3c40fbaa66ebfa9deb71c2
Accession Number: edsdoj.7394ba6f7c3c40fbaa66ebfa9deb71c2
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:25369660
DOI:10.1186/s43161-024-00246-y
Published in:Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Language:English