Placental thickness in 2D prenatal ultrasonographic examination
| Title: | Placental thickness in 2D prenatal ultrasonographic examination |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Iwona Strzelecka, Filip F. Karuga, Bartosz Szmyd, Aleksandra Walter, Gabriela Daszkiewicz, Maria Respondek-Liberska |
| Source: | Archives of Medical Science, Vol 19, Iss 6, Pp 1768-1773 (2021) |
| Publisher Information: | Termedia Publishing House, 2021. |
| Publication Year: | 2021 |
| Collection: | LCC:Medicine |
| Subject Terms: | ultrasonography, gestational age, obstetrics, maternal bmi, placental thickness, maternal weight, Medicine |
| More Details: | Introduction The placental thickness (PTh) is an ultrasonographic measurement commonly used to assess the placenta. The study aimed to determine selected factors influencing PTh in 2D prenatal ultrasonographic examination. It might have a special value in difficult cases for interpretation when PTh is above or below the reference values. Material and methods In this retrospective study, we analysed the results of foetal ECHO examination of 2833 foetuses performed between June 2016 and December 2019 in our single unit. 596 healthy foetuses older than 12 weeks of gestation from singleton pregnancies were enrolled in the study. The following parameters were used in the further analysis: placental implantation site, gestational age according to the last menstrual period (LMP) and foetal biometry (FB); maternal weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) at the time of examination; and PTh. Results PTh was affected by its location: posterior 33 mm vs. anterior 30 mm (p < 0.001). Moreover, its thickness significantly correlated with gestational age according to FB (r = 0.386, p < 0.001), LMP (r = 0.369, p < 0.001), maternal weight (r = 0.192, p < 0.001), height (r = 0.125, p = 0.002), and BMI (r = 0.147, p < 0.001), but not with maternal age (r = 0.050, p = 0.219). A linear regression model based on these data explained the 16.38% variability of the tested subjects (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our observations suggest that maternal weight correlated more strongly with PTh than maternal BMI. For PTh evaluation, it is important to pay attention to the placental implantation site – the posterior placenta was thicker than the anterior placenta. Moreover, PTh variability remains largely unknown; therefore, further research in this field is needed. |
| Document Type: | article |
| File Description: | electronic resource |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 1734-1922 1896-9151 |
| Relation: | https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Placental-thickness-in-2D-prenatal-ultrasonographic-examination,132778,0,2.html; https://doaj.org/toc/1734-1922; https://doaj.org/toc/1896-9151 |
| DOI: | 10.5114/aoms/132778 |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/cd7136bb21ca4a119a82fa3020a84e96 |
| Accession Number: | edsdoj.7136bb21ca4a119a82fa3020a84e96 |
| Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| ISSN: | 17341922 18969151 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.5114/aoms/132778 |
| Published in: | Archives of Medical Science |
| Language: | English |