Comparison of two different doses of dexmedetomidine for continuous epidural analgesia for lower limb surgeries: A randomized double-blind study

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of two different doses of dexmedetomidine for continuous epidural analgesia for lower limb surgeries: A randomized double-blind study
Authors: Pranjali Kurhekar, Sam Blessy Sheba, Sathyasuba Meenakshisundaram, Raghuraman M. Sethuraman, Neeta Parlikar
Source: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Vol 40, Iss 3, Pp 451-456 (2024)
Publisher Information: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Anesthesiology
LCC:Pharmacy and materia medica
Subject Terms: dexmedetomidine, epidural analgesia, hemodynamic stability, ropivacaine, key message: epidural dexmedetomidine can cause profound hypotension. the optimum, safe dose of dexmedetomidine is not known. in our study, we observed that continuous epidural infusion of 1 μg/kg/24 h dexmedetomidine provides better analgesia with acceptable hemodynamic variations., Anesthesiology, RD78.3-87.3, Pharmacy and materia medica, RS1-441
More Details: Background and Aims: Bolus epidural dexmedetomidine provides potent analgesia but the incidence of hemodynamic instability is high. There are only a few studies that have evaluated the efficacy of epidural dexmedetomidine infusion but none of them compared different doses to find the optimum safe dose. We compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of two different doses of dexmedetomidine in continuous epidural for postoperative analgesia. Material and Methods: Patients undergoing lower limb surgeries were divided randomly into two groups: Group I (n = 36) received an epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.5 μg/kg/24 h of dexmedetomidine and Group II (n = 36) received epidural infusion 0.1% ropivacaine + 1 μg/kg/24 h of dexmedetomidine. Both groups received epidural infusion at the rate of 5 ml/h over 48 h postoperatively. Pain scores, demand for rescue analgesics, hemodynamic parameters, and sedation scores were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was done using an independent t-test and Chi-square test. Results: 1 μg/kg group (Group II) had a significantly reduced pain score at all time intervals and less demand for rescue analgesia (P = 0.03). The severity of pain was more in the 0.5 μg/kg group (Group I), at all times (P = 0.000). Incidence hypotension was higher in Group II. Bradycardia was seen in two patients in Group II and none in Group I. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in a dose of 1 μg/kg/24 h with 5 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine through epidural infusion provides better analgesia with a safe hemodynamic profile.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 0970-9185
2231-2730
Relation: https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_23; https://doaj.org/toc/0970-9185; https://doaj.org/toc/2231-2730
DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_23
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/6d43a1cd3afe43f0a08600bdbe3e83b4
Accession Number: edsdoj.6d43a1cd3afe43f0a08600bdbe3e83b4
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:09709185
22312730
DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_88_23
Published in:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Language:English