Academic Journal
Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology
Title: | Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology |
---|---|
Authors: | Shinichi Nakagawa, David W. Armitage, Tom Froese, Yefeng Yang, Malgorzata Lagisz |
Source: | BMC Biology, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2025) |
Publisher Information: | BMC, 2025. |
Publication Year: | 2025 |
Collection: | LCC:Biology (General) |
Subject Terms: | Questionable research practice, Replication crisis, Credibility revolution, Team science, SORTEE, Biology (General), QH301-705.5 |
More Details: | Abstract While psychologists have extensively discussed the notion of a “theory crisis” arising from vague and incorrect hypotheses, there has been no debate about such a crisis in biology. However, biologists have long discussed communication failures between theoreticians and empiricists. We argue such failure is one aspect of a theory crisis because misapplied and misunderstood theories lead to poor hypotheses and research waste. We review its solutions and compare them with methodology-focused solutions proposed for replication crises. We conclude by discussing how promoting inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility (IDEA) in theoretical biology could contribute to ameliorating breakdowns in the theory-empirical cycle. |
Document Type: | article |
File Description: | electronic resource |
Language: | English |
ISSN: | 1741-7007 |
Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1741-7007 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12915-025-02134-w |
Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/d6ca6a4d5e604d6d96208b38adc94f8c |
Accession Number: | edsdoj.6ca6a4d5e604d6d96208b38adc94f8c |
Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full text is not displayed to guests. | Login for full access. |
Be the first to leave a comment!