Clinical and imaging clues to the diagnosis and follow‐up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis

Bibliographic Details
Title: Clinical and imaging clues to the diagnosis and follow‐up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis
Authors: Kevin R. Keene, Hermien E. Kan, Stijn van derMeeren, Berit M. Verbist, Martijn R. Tannemaat, Jan‐Willem M. Beenakker, Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
Source: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 2820-2834 (2022)
Publisher Information: Wiley, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
LCC:Human anatomy
Subject Terms: Ophthalmoparesis, Ptosis, Extra‐ocular muscles, Imaging, Neuromuscular disease, Involvement pattern, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, RC925-935, Human anatomy, QM1-695
More Details: Abstract Ophthalmoparesis and ptosis can be caused by a wide range of rare or more prevalent diseases, several of which can be successfully treated. In this review, we provide clues to aid in the diagnosis of these diseases, based on the clinical symptoms, the involvement pattern and imaging features of extra‐ocular muscles (EOM). Dysfunction of EOM including the levator palpebrae can be due to muscle weakness, anatomical restrictions or pathology affecting the innervation. A comprehensive literature review was performed to find clinical and imaging clues for the diagnosis and follow‐up of ptosis and ophthalmoparesis. We used five patterns as a framework for differential diagnostic reasoning and for pattern recognition in symptomatology, EOM involvement and imaging results of individual patients. The five patterns were characterized by the presence of combination of ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, diplopia, pain, proptosis, nystagmus, extra‐orbital symptoms, symmetry or fluctuations in symptoms. Each pattern was linked to anatomical locations and either hereditary or acquired diseases. Hereditary muscle diseases often lead to ophthalmoparesis without diplopia as a predominant feature, while in acquired eye muscle diseases ophthalmoparesis is often asymmetrical and can be accompanied by proptosis and pain. Fluctuation is a hallmark of an acquired synaptic disease like myasthenia gravis. Nystagmus is indicative of a central nervous system lesion. Second, specific EOM involvement patterns can also provide valuable diagnostic clues. In hereditary muscle diseases like chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) and oculo‐pharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) the superior rectus is often involved. In neuropathic disease, the pattern of involvement of the EOM can be linked to specific cranial nerves. In myasthenia gravis this pattern is variable within patients over time. Lastly, orbital imaging can aid in the diagnosis. Fat replacement of the EOM is commonly observed in hereditary myopathic diseases, such as CPEO. In contrast, inflammation and volume increases are often observed in acquired muscle diseases such as Graves' orbitopathy. In diseases with ophthalmoparesis and ptosis specific patterns of clinical symptoms, the EOM involvement pattern and orbital imaging provide valuable information for diagnosis and could prove valuable in the follow‐up of disease progression and the understanding of disease pathophysiology.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2190-6009
2190-5991
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2190-5991; https://doaj.org/toc/2190-6009
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13089
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/ed6781bda9e8467fa3e12eea8a4db0ee
Accession Number: edsdoj.6781bda9e8467fa3e12eea8a4db0ee
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:21906009
21905991
DOI:10.1002/jcsm.13089
Published in:Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Language:English