Prescribing differences among older adults with differing health cover and socioeconomic status: a cohort study

Bibliographic Details
Title: Prescribing differences among older adults with differing health cover and socioeconomic status: a cohort study
Authors: Ciaran Prendergast, Michelle Flood, Logan T. Murry, Barbara Clyne, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty
Source: BMC Geriatrics, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Geriatrics
Subject Terms: Polypharmacy, Medications, Prescribing, Primary care, General practice, Older adults, Geriatrics, RC952-954.6
More Details: Abstract Introduction As health reforms move Ireland from a mixed public-private system toward universal healthcare, it is important to understand variations in prescribing practice for patients with differing health cover and socioeconomic status. This study aims to determine how prescribing patterns for patients aged ≥ 65 years in primary care in Ireland differ between patients with public and private health cover. Methods This was an observational study using anonymised data collected as part of a larger study from 44 general practices in Ireland (2011–2018). Data were extracted from electronic records relating to demographics and prescribing for patients aged ≥ 65 years. The cohort was divided between those with public health cover (via the General Medical Services (GMS) scheme) and those without. Standardised rates of prescribing were calculated for pre-specified drug classes. We also analysed the number of medications, polypharmacy, and trends over time between groups, using multilevel linear regression adjusting for age and sex, and hospitalisations. Results Overall, 42,456 individuals were included (56% female). Most were covered by the GMS scheme (62%, n = 26,490). The rate of prescribing in all drug classes was higher for GMS patients compared to non-GMS patients, with the greatest difference in benzodiazepine anxiolytics. The mean number of unique medications prescribed to GMS patients was 10.9 (SD 5.9), and 8.1 (SD 5.8) for non-GMS patients. The number of unique medications prescribed to both GMS and non-GMS cohorts increased over time. The increase was steeper in the GMS group where the mean number of medications prescribed increased by 0.67 medications/year. The rate of increase was 0.13 (95%CI 0.13, 0.14) medications/year lower for non-GMS patients, a statistically significant difference. Conclusion Our study found a significantly larger number of medications were prescribed to patients with public health cover, compared to those without. Increasing medication burden and polypharmacy among older adults may be accelerated for those of lower socioeconomic status. These findings may inform planning for moves towards universal health care, and this would provide an opportunity to evaluate the effect of expanding entitlement on prescribing and medications use.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1471-2318
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2318
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04441-9
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/62ee7e2a5acd42779e79ce7422c356e6
Accession Number: edsdoj.62ee7e2a5acd42779e79ce7422c356e6
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:14712318
DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04441-9
Published in:BMC Geriatrics
Language:English