Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries

Bibliographic Details
Title: Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries
Authors: Tsui-o Tai, Janeen Baxter, Belinda Hewitt
Source: Demographic Research, Vol 31, p 3 (2014)
Publisher Information: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2014.
Publication Year: 2014
Collection: LCC:Demography. Population. Vital events
Subject Terms: cohabitation, cross-national, living apart together (LAT), marriage, relationship satisfaction, unions, Demography. Population. Vital events, HB848-3697
More Details: Background: A large body of research has compared relationship satisfaction and quality in cohabiting versus married relationships. Despite increased recognition of couples in living apart together (LAT) relationships, very little research has examined the experiences of couples in LAT relationships compared to co-residential unions. Objective: Our aim is to develop knowledge about the experiences of different union types by investigating relationship satisfaction of people in LAT, cohabiting, and marital relationships. We differentiate those with intentions to marry for cohabiters, and those with intentions to marry or live together in LAT relationships. We also examine differences by gender and country. Methods: Using data from Wave 1 of the Generations and Gender Survey in France, Germany, Australia, and Russia (n = 9,604), OLS regressions are estimated to investigate a) differences in relationship satisfaction across relationship types, and b) across countries. Results: Married people have the highest levels of relationship satisfaction. People in non-marital unions with intentions to marry or live together are significantly more satisfied than those without marriage or cohabitation intentions. Those in LAT relationships with no intentions to live together have the lowest levels of relationship satisfaction. There is evidence of cross-national variation with differences in relationship satisfaction by union type most pronounced in Australia and Russia. Gender differences are found with women reporting lower levels of relationship satisfaction than men. Conclusions: LAT relationships are qualitatively different to co-residential unions. It is important to further develop our understanding of the experiences of couples in these relationships.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1435-9871
Relation: http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol31/3/; https://doaj.org/toc/1435-9871
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.3
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/e5ef0085e1c140b1b6062e1f4b4e329a
Accession Number: edsdoj.5ef0085e1c140b1b6062e1f4b4e329a
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:14359871
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.3
Published in:Demographic Research
Language:English