Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk

Bibliographic Details
Title: Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk
Authors: Hui-Chen Wu, Yunjia Lai, Yuyan Liao, Maya Deyssenroth, Gary W. Miller, Regina M. Santella, Mary Beth Terry
Source: Breast Cancer Research, Vol 26, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Subject Terms: Breast cancer epidemiology, BOADICEA, Metabolome, Metabolomics, Nested case–control study, Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
More Details: Abstract Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and incidence rates are increasing; metabolomics may be a promising approach for identifying the drivers of the increasing trends that cannot be explained by changes in known BC risk factors. Methods We conducted a nested case–control study (median followup 6.3 years) within the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) (n = 40 cases and 70 age-matched controls). We conducted a metabolome-wide association study using untargeted metabolomics coupling hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and C18 chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) to identify BC-related metabolic features. Results We found eight metabolic features associated with BC risk. For the four metabolites negatively associated with risk, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14, 0.66) (L-Histidine) to 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.98) (N-Acetylgalactosamine), and for the four metabolites positively associated with risk, ORs ranged from 1.61 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.51, (m/z: 101.5813, RT: 90.4, 1,3-dibutyl-1-nitrosourea, a potential carcinogen)) to 2.20 (95% CI: 1.15, 4.23) (11-cis-Eicosenic acid). These results were no longer statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Adding the BC-related metabolic features to a model, including age, the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) risk score improved the accuracy of BC prediction from an area under the curve (AUC) of 66% to 83%. Conclusions If replicated in larger prospective cohorts, these findings offer promising new ways to identify exposures related to BC and improve BC risk prediction.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1465-542X
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1465-542X
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01896-5
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/5d24ac3c9901483fb875989f755adfb7
Accession Number: edsdoj.5d24ac3c9901483fb875989f755adfb7
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:1465542X
DOI:10.1186/s13058-024-01896-5
Published in:Breast Cancer Research
Language:English