Body image and quality of life undergoing totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study

Bibliographic Details
Title: Body image and quality of life undergoing totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study
Authors: Ju Houqiong, Yuan Yuli, Guo Fujia, Gao Gengmei, Liu Yaxiong, Liang Yahang, Li Tao, Liu Yang, Liu Dongning, Li Taiyuan
Source: BMC Surgery, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Surgery
Subject Terms: Totally robotic distal gastrectomy, Robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy, Propensity score matching, Body image, Quality of life, Surgery, RD1-811
More Details: Abstract Background With the improvement of anastomotic techniques and the iteration of anastomotic instruments, robotic intracorporeal suturing has become increasingly proficient. The era of fully intracorporeal anastomosis in robotic gastric cancer resection is emerging. This study aims to explore the impact of totally robotic distal gastrectomy (TRDG) and robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) on patients’ quality of life. Patients and methods This study is a comparative retrospective study of propensity score matching. This study included 306 patients who underwent robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between June 2016 and December 2023 at our center. Covariates used in the propensity score included sex, age, BMI, ASA score, maximum tumour diameter, degree of histological differentiation, Pathological TNM stage, Pathological T stage, Pathological N stage, and Lauren classification. Outcome measures included operative time, intraoperative bleeding, time to first venting, time to first fluid intake, postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, total length of abdominal incision, postoperative complications, inflammatory response, body image, and quality of life. Results According to the results of the study, compared with the RADG group, the TRDG group had a faster recovery time for gastrointestinal function (P = 0.025), shorter length of abdominal incision (P
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1471-2482
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2482
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02597-8
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/5d0e91f8a3ff4831a3e1ff13c3c1d875
Accession Number: edsdoj.5d0e91f8a3ff4831a3e1ff13c3c1d875
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:14712482
DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02597-8
Published in:BMC Surgery
Language:English