Cumulative Risk Meets Inter-Individual Variability: Probabilistic Concentration Addition of Complex Mixture Exposures in a Population-Based Human In Vitro Model

Bibliographic Details
Title: Cumulative Risk Meets Inter-Individual Variability: Probabilistic Concentration Addition of Complex Mixture Exposures in a Population-Based Human In Vitro Model
Authors: Suji Jang, Lucie C. Ford, Ivan Rusyn, Weihsueh A. Chiu
Source: Toxics, Vol 10, Iss 10, p 549 (2022)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Chemical technology
Subject Terms: cumulative risk, dose addition, concentration addition, inter-individual variability, toxicodynamics, chemical mixtures, Chemical technology, TP1-1185
More Details: Although humans are continuously exposed to complex chemical mixtures in the environment, it has been extremely challenging to investigate the resulting cumulative risks and impacts. Recent studies proposed the use of “new approach methods,” in particular in vitro assays, for hazard and dose–response evaluation of mixtures. We previously found, using five human cell-based assays, that concentration addition (CA), the usual default approach to calculate cumulative risk, is mostly accurate to within an order of magnitude. Here, we extend these findings to further investigate how cell-based data can be used to quantify inter-individual variability in CA. Utilizing data from testing 42 Superfund priority chemicals separately and in 8 defined mixtures in a human cell-based population-wide in vitro model, we applied CA to predict effective concentrations for cytotoxicity for each individual, for “typical” (median) and “sensitive” (first percentile) members of the population, and for the median-to-sensitive individual ratio (defined as the toxicodynamic variability factor, TDVF). We quantified the accuracy of CA with the Loewe Additivity Index (LAI). We found that LAI varies more between different mixtures than between different individuals, and that predictions of the population median are generally more accurate than predictions for the “sensitive” individual or the TDVF. Moreover, LAI values were generally
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2305-6304
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/10/10/549; https://doaj.org/toc/2305-6304
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100549
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/562bdd9cbe5141eba9e2172ef4636d99
Accession Number: edsdoj.562bdd9cbe5141eba9e2172ef4636d99
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:23056304
DOI:10.3390/toxics10100549
Published in:Toxics
Language:English