A patient satisfaction survey and educational package to improve the care of people hospitalised with COVID-19: a quality improvement project, Liverpool, UK [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Bibliographic Details
Title: A patient satisfaction survey and educational package to improve the care of people hospitalised with COVID-19: a quality improvement project, Liverpool, UK [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Authors: Tom Wingfield, Scott Rory Hicks, Muhammad Shamsher Ahmad, Rajia Akter Ahmed, Rebecca Watson, Marcella Vaselli, Lewis Jones, Fatima Hayat, Meng-San Wu, Mark McKenna, Libuse Ratcliffe, Sylviane Defres, Paul Hine
Source: Wellcome Open Research, Vol 6 (2021)
Publisher Information: Wellcome, 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Collection: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Science
Subject Terms: Coronavirus, Covid-19, patient satisfaction, patient perspective, patient feedback, patient experience, quality improvement project, eng, Medicine, Science
More Details: Background: The perspectives and experiences of people hospitalised with COVID-19 have been under-reported during the coronavirus pandemic. We developed and conducted a COVID-19 patient satisfaction survey in a large university-affiliated secondary healthcare centre in Liverpool, UK, during Europe’s first coronavirus wave (April-June 2020). The survey found that care was rated highly, including among people of Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) background. However, sleep-quality and communication about medications and discharge-planning were identified as areas for improvement. Methods: To improve care for people with COVID-19 admitted to our centre, we designed an educational package for healthcare professionals working on COVID-19 wards. The package, implemented in August 2020, included healthcare worker training sessions on providing holistic care and placement of “Practice Pointers” posters. Patient satisfaction was re-evaluated during the second/third COVID-19 waves in Liverpool (September 2020 - February 2021). Results: Across waves, most (95%) respondents reported that they would recommend our hospital to friends and/or family and rated overall care highly. Comparison of the responses of second/third-wave respondents (n=101) with first-wave respondents (n=94) suggested improved patient satisfaction across most care domains but especially those related to having worries and fears addressed and being consulted about medications and their side-effects. Conclusions: People admitted with COVID-19 to our centre in Liverpool, including those from BAME background, rated the care they received highly. A simple education package improved the feedback on care received by respondents between the first and second/third waves. These UK-first findings are informing regional strategies to improve person-centred care of hospitalised people with COVID-19.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2398-502X
Relation: https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/6-222/v1; https://doaj.org/toc/2398-502X
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17163.1
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/54af0e6854e347b3aa7f96c9997fa774
Accession Number: edsdoj.54af0e6854e347b3aa7f96c9997fa774
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:2398502X
DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17163.1
Published in:Wellcome Open Research
Language:English