Comparison of Outcomes Regarding Weight Loss in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients- A Cohort Study

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of Outcomes Regarding Weight Loss in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients- A Cohort Study
Authors: Sandeep Verma, Rituparna Chatterjee, Manoj Yadav, Vidit, Bhavinder Kumar Arora, Harpreet Singh Jolly, Prafull Arya
Source: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol 18, Iss 02, Pp 05-08 (2024)
Publisher Information: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Medicine
Subject Terms: body mass index, excess weight loss, glycosylated haemoglobin, morbid obesity, Medicine
More Details: Introduction: Obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health. Body Mass Index (BMI) is a simple index of weight for height (kg/m2) that is commonly used to classify overweight and obesity in adults. Mini Gastric Bypass (MGB) leads to improved quality of life, reduction in episodes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), high patient acceptance, early safety, and efficacy. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is a restrictive, irreversible procedure in which stomach capacity is markedly reduced by creating a lesser curvature tube. MGB is mildly restrictive but importantly, a malabsorptive operation. Many observational studies have concluded that better weight loss and diabetes remission are the advantages of MGB. However, comparative studies of outcomes and complications between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and MGB are still scarce. Aim: To compare the effectiveness and outcomes regarding weight loss after LSG and MGB in morbidly obese patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was carried out in the Department of Surgery of SPS Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India from 1st June 2018 to 31st May 2019. Adults between 20-70 years of age and with BMI >37.5 without co-morbidities, and BMI >32.5 with co-morbidities Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) were included. The authors included 59 patients; 34 patients underwent MGB (22 were female and 12 were male) and 25 patients underwent LSG (18 were female and 7 were male). A comparison of continuous variables between the study groups was done using the Student’s t-test. For comparing categorical data, a Chi-square (χ2) test was performed. Results: The overall % Excess Weight Loss (EWL) after MGB ranged from 27.74 to 62.32% with a mean of 44.88±17.44%. The overall % EWL after LSG ranged from 26.62 to 45.8% with a mean of 36.21±9.59%. (p0.05). None of the patients required readmission post LSG, while 3% (1/34) required readmission post MGB. None of the patients had postoperative leakage in both groups. Conclusion: The better outcome was associated with MGB in terms of the percentage of Excess Weight Loss (EWL).
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2249-782X
0973-709X
Relation: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/19085/67318_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(KK_SS)_Ref_Pat(RDW_SS)_PF1(RI_KM)_PFA(RI_KM)_PN(KM).pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X; https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67318.19085
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/528929cf6cde45e5b8c9634d185de423
Accession Number: edsdoj.528929cf6cde45e5b8c9634d185de423
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:2249782X
0973709X
DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2024/67318.19085
Published in:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Language:English