The subjective and objective quality of life score (SOQOLTM) for the quantification of general health status: a preliminary study with initial normative population values

Bibliographic Details
Title: The subjective and objective quality of life score (SOQOLTM) for the quantification of general health status: a preliminary study with initial normative population values
Authors: Ralph J. Mobbs, R. Dineth Fonseka, Pragadesh Natarajan, Lianne Koinis, Monish Maharaj
Source: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024)
Publisher Information: SpringerOpen, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
Subject Terms: Walking, Gait analysis, Walking speed, Gait speed, Step count, Daily step count, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
More Details: Abstract Background Established health-related quality of life scores do not consider both subjective and objective indices of health. We propose the subjective and objective quality of life score (SOQOL) for the comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life and aim to provide normative population data. The SOQOL is compatible with smartphone applications, allowing widespread use on a global scale. Methods Normative SOQOL population data was sourced from pre-existing datasets on the EQ-5D-5L, daily step count, and walking speed. Normative values were calculated using weighted grand means. We trialled the SOQOL in a group of five patients presenting to a spinal neurosurgery clinic. Results SOQOL scores decreased with age, and women had lower scores in every age group. In our case series, the spine patients with the biggest SOQOL deficit compared to age- and sex-matched population averages were found to be surgical while the rest were non-surgical. Conclusions The SOQOL shows promise as a simple and effective scoring tool that is compatible with smartphones, potentially useful for screening in primary and specialized care settings, and for assessment following healthcare interventions. This study, however, is preliminary, and the findings are primarily suggestive. They underline the necessity for future, more comprehensive studies to validate and expand upon these initial observations. The conclusion of both this abstract and the full paper will clearly state these limitations and the preliminary nature of the study.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2509-8020
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2509-8020
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00684-1
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/52323f1e9257406fa202b772f6ec0df6
Accession Number: edsdoj.52323f1e9257406fa202b772f6ec0df6
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:25098020
DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00684-1
Published in:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Language:English