| Title: |
Core outcome set for studies on pregnant women with vasa previa (COVasP): a study protocol |
| Authors: |
Rohan D’Souza, Linda Villani, Chelsea Hall, Meron Seyoum, John Kingdom, Michael Krznaric, Natasha Donnolley, Nasrin Javid |
| Source: |
BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 7 (2020) |
| Publisher Information: |
BMJ Publishing Group, 2020. |
| Publication Year: |
2020 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Medicine |
| Subject Terms: |
Medicine |
| More Details: |
Introduction Vasa previa is a condition where fetal blood vessels run unprotected in the membranes, outside the umbilical cord, and cross the internal opening of the cervix. During rupture of membranes, these vessels can rupture and put the baby at serious risk of severe blood loss and death. Numerous studies are being conducted to improve diagnostic modalities and establish clear management plans to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, the lack of a standardised set of outcomes for studies on vasa previa makes it difficult to compare study findings and draw meaningful conclusions. Through this project, we will be developing a core outcome set for studies on pregnant women with vasa previa (COVasP).Methods and analysis The development of COVasP will involve five steps. The first will be a systematic review, in which we will generate a long list of outcomes based on published studies in pregnancies complicated with vasa previa. The second will involve in-depth interviews with current and former patients, their family members and healthcare providers who care for these patients. This will be followed by a two-round Delphi survey, which will aim to narrow down the long list of outcomes into those considered important by four groups of ‘stakeholders’: (1) patients, family members and patient advocates/representatives, (2) healthcare providers, (3) researchers, epidemiologists and methodologists and (4) other stakeholders directly or indirectly involved in the management of these pregnancies such as administrators, guideline developers and policymakers. The fourth step will involve a face-to-face consensus meeting using a nominal group approach to establish a finalised core outcome set. The final step will involve measuring and defining the identified outcomes using a combination of systematic reviews and Delphi surveys.Ethics and dissemination This study as well as consent forms for stakeholder participation have received approval from the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board (REB number 18-0173-E) on 05 September 2018 and the Human Research Ethics Committee at The University of Technology Sydney, Australia on 30 July 2019 (UTS HREC reference number ETH19-3718). All progress will be documented on the international prospective register of systematic reviews and Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials databases.Registration details http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1117. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
2044-6055 |
| Relation: |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e034018.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055 |
| DOI: |
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034018 |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/d472d6b9db0a4c629829c78b979bd945 |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.472d6b9db0a4c629829c78b979bd945 |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
