Comparison of first-line treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab versus R-CHOP for patients with follicular lymphoma grade 3A: Results of a retrospective study from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of first-line treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab versus R-CHOP for patients with follicular lymphoma grade 3A: Results of a retrospective study from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi
Authors: Gloria Margiotta-Casaluci, Sara Bigliardi, Federica Cocito, Erika Meli, Luigi Petrucci, Maura Nicolosi, Ombretta Annibali, Carola Boccomini, Valentina Bozzoli, Alessia Castellino, Federica Cattina, Natalia Cenfra, Sabino Ciavarella, Sofya Kovalchuk, Francesco Rotondo, Angelo Fama, Jacopo Olivieri, Francesco Zaja
Source: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 13 (2023)
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Subject Terms: follicular lymphoma, grade 3A, bendamustine, CHOP, rituximab, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
More Details: In the setting of follicular lymphoma (FL), frontline therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has represented for many years the standard of care for patients with symptomatic advanced disease. More recently, the combination of bendamustine plus rituximab (R-B) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option. We present a retrospective, multicenter, observational study aimed at comparing outcomes and toxicities observed in 145 patients diagnosed with grade 3A FL treated with a first line therapy in 15 Italian Fondazione Italiana Linfomi centers between the 1st of January 2014 and the 30th of May 2018. Seventy patients were treated with R-B and 75 with R-CHOP. In the R-B group, the median age at the time of diagnosis was 67 years compared with 59 years in the R-CHOP group. Patients in R-B group achieved a similar overall response rate (96% vs. 99%) and a better complete remission rate (87% vs. 80%, p=0.035) compared with patients in R-CHOP group. Progression free survival (PFS) was similar between individual treated with R-CHOP and R-B (48- month PFS 77.7% vs. 76.6% respectively, p=0.745). The overall survival was significantly longer with R-CHOP treatment (HR=0.16; 95% IC, 0.04-0.74; p=0.007); however, no statistical significant difference was observed after adjustment for age. With the limitations of the study design, our results suggest that both R-B and R-CHOP seem to be valid first-line treatment options in FL3A.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2234-943X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120967/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1120967
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/3b227feed7e9451ba1763b7a2727dde7
Accession Number: edsdoj.3b227feed7e9451ba1763b7a2727dde7
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:2234943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1120967
Published in:Frontiers in Oncology
Language:English