Combined multimodal ctDNA analysis and radiological imaging for tumor surveillance in Non-small cell lung cancer

Bibliographic Details
Title: Combined multimodal ctDNA analysis and radiological imaging for tumor surveillance in Non-small cell lung cancer
Authors: Martin Metzenmacher, Balazs Hegedüs, Jan Forster, Alexander Schramm, Peter A. Horn, Christoph A. Klein, Nicola Bielefeld, Till Ploenes, Clemens Aigner, Dirk Theegarten, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Jens T. Siveke, Martin Schuler, Smiths S. Lueong
Source: Translational Oncology, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 101279- (2022)
Publisher Information: Elsevier, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Subject Terms: Lung cancer, ddPCR, NGS, cfDNA methylation, Surveillance, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
More Details: Background: Radiology is the current standard for monitoring treatment responses in lung cancer. Limited sensitivity, exposure to ionizing radiations and related sequelae constitute some of its major limitation. Non-invasive and highly sensitive methods for early detection of treatment failures and resistance-associated disease progression would have additional clinical utility. Methods: We analyzed serially collected plasma and paired tumor samples from lung cancer patients (61 with stage IV, 48 with stages I-III disease) and 61 healthy samples by means of next-generation sequencing, radiological imaging and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) mutation and methylation assays. Results: A 62% variant concordance between tumor-reported and circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing was observed between baseline liquid and tissue biopsies in stage IV patients. Interestingly, ctDNA sequencing allowed for the identification of resistance-mediating p.T790M mutations in baseline plasma samples for which no such mutation was observed in the corresponding tissue. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation analysis by means of ddPCR revealed a general decrease in ctDNA loads between baseline and first reassessment. Additionally, serial ctDNA analyses only recapitulated computed tomography (CT) -monitored tumor dynamics of some, but not all lesions within the same patient. To complement ctDNA variant analysis we devised a ctDNA methylation assay (methcfDNA) based on methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. cfDNA methylation showed and area under the curve (AUC) of > 0.90 in early and late stage cases. A decrease in methcfDNA between baseline and first reassessment was reflected by a decrease in CT-derive tumor surface area, irrespective of tumor mutational status. Conclusion: Taken together, our data support the use of cfDNA sequencing for unbiased characterization of the molecular tumor architecture, highlights the impact of tumor architectural heterogeneity on ctDNA-based tumor surveillance and the added value of complementary approaches such as cfDNA methylation for early detection and monitoring
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1936-5233
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523321002709; https://doaj.org/toc/1936-5233
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101279
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/d3b1076963f443d6a11522f1b04db4d4
Accession Number: edsdoj.3b1076963f443d6a11522f1b04db4d4
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:19365233
DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101279
Published in:Translational Oncology
Language:English