Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Effects on mechanical power of different devices used for inhaled sedation in a bench model of protective ventilation in ICU |
| Authors: |
Pierre-Louis Pellet, Neven Stevic, Florian Degivry, Bruno Louis, Laurent Argaud, Claude Guérin, Martin Cour |
| Source: |
Annals of Intensive Care, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024) |
| Publisher Information: |
SpringerOpen, 2024. |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid |
| Subject Terms: |
Sevoflurane, MIRUS, AnaConDa, Dead space, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Sedation, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, RC86-88.9 |
| More Details: |
Abstract Background Inhaled sedation during invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has received increasing attention. However, inhaled sedation devices increase dead-space ventilation and an undesirable effect is the increase in minute ventilation needed to maintain CO2 removal. A consequence of raising minute ventilation is an increase in mechanical power (MP) that can promote lung injury. However, the effect of inhaled sedation devices on MP remains unknown. Methods We conducted a bench study to assess and compare the effects of three devices delivering inhaled sevoflurane currently available in ICU (AnaConDa-50 mL (ANA-50), AnaConDa-100 mL (ANA-100), and MIRUS) on MP by using a test lung model set with three compliances (20, 40, and 60 mL/cmH2O). We simulated lung-protective ventilation using a low tidal volume and two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (5 and 15 cmH2O) under ambient temperature and dry conditions. Following the insertion of the devices, either the respiratory rate or tidal volume was increased in 15%-steps until end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) returned to the baseline value. MP was calculated at baseline and after EtCO2 correction using a simplified equation. Results Following device insertion, the EtCO2 increase was significantly greater with MIRUS (+ 78 ± 13%) and ANA-100 (+ 100 ± 11%) than with ANA-50 (+ 49 ± 7%). After normalizing EtCO2 by adjusting minute ventilation, MP significantly increased by more than 50% with all inhaled sedation devices compared to controls. The lowest increase in MP was observed with ANA-50 (p 50% with all devices after normalizing EtCO2 by adjusting minute ventilation. Conclusion Inhaled sedation devices substantially increased MP in this bench model of protective ventilation, which might limit their benefits in ARDS. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
2110-5820 |
| Relation: |
https://doaj.org/toc/2110-5820 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s13613-024-01245-x |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/3ab533957569482b946748718bb83055 |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.3ab533957569482b946748718bb83055 |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
