Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges—Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Bibliographic Details
Title: Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges—Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis
Authors: Gioia Mastromoro, Daniele Guadagnolo, Nader Khaleghi Hashemian, Enrica Marchionni, Alice Traversa, Antonio Pizzuti
Source: Diagnostics, Vol 12, Iss 3, p 575 (2022)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: molecular approaches, chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, genome sequencing, prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, Medicine (General), R5-920
More Details: Fetal malformations occur in 2–3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. “Structural anomalies” include non-transient anatomic alterations. “Soft markers” are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as “dynamic”. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2075-4418
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/3/575; https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/c3a14fc1b068421ca949cbbcaeb39b84
Accession Number: edsdoj.3a14fc1b068421ca949cbbcaeb39b84
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:20754418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12030575
Published in:Diagnostics
Language:English