The validity, reliability and feasibility of four instruments for assessing the consciousness of stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit compared

Bibliographic Details
Title: The validity, reliability and feasibility of four instruments for assessing the consciousness of stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit compared
Authors: Xiaoxiang Yan, Lingjun Xiao, Meixin Liao, Jiajian Huang, Zhijie He, Tiebin Yan
Source: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022)
Publisher Information: BMC, 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: Consciousness, Intensive care, Assessment scales, Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale, Motor activity assessment scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, Medicine (General), R5-920
More Details: Abstract Background Early rehabilitation is the foundation for recovery for those admitted to an intensive care unit. Appropriate assessment of consciousness is needed before any rehabilitative intervention begins. Methods This prospective study compared the validity, reliability and applicability of the sedation-agitation scale, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, the motor activity assessment scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale in a working neurological intensive care unit. Eighty-three stroke patients were assessed with the four scales by the same 3 raters acting independently: a senior physician, a senior therapist and a trainee. That generated 996 assessment records for comparison. Results Good agreement (r=0.98–0.99) was found among the sedation-agitation scale, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, the motor activity assessment scale scores, but the Glasgow Coma Scale ratings correlated less well (r=0.72–0.76) with the others. Consistent results were also found among the three raters. After stratification of the ratings by age, gender, level of consciousness and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, the scales reported significant differences among the levels of consciousness and among those with different Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation results, but not with different age or gender strata. Conclusions The four instruments tested are all reliable enough and feasible for use as a tool for consciousness screening in a neurological intensive care unit.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1471-2288
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2288
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01580-2
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/31caff68b33b4720b8be10808c0aaf0f
Accession Number: edsdoj.31caff68b33b4720b8be10808c0aaf0f
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:14712288
DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01580-2
Published in:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Language:English