Analysis of Periprocedural X-ray Exposure in Transarterial Radioembolization with Glass or Resin Microspheres

Bibliographic Details
Title: Analysis of Periprocedural X-ray Exposure in Transarterial Radioembolization with Glass or Resin Microspheres
Authors: Constantin Ehrengut, Johanna Vogt, Jakob Leonhardi, Emma Carabenciov, Felix Teske, Florian van Boemmel, Thomas Berg, Daniel Seehofer, Thomas Lincke, Osama Sabri, Holger Gößmann, Timm Denecke, Sebastian Ebel
Source: Diagnostics, Vol 13, Iss 24, p 3609 (2023)
Publisher Information: MDPI AG, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: Transarterial Radioembolization, radiation protection, Medicine (General), R5-920
More Details: Background: Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) is an effective treatment option for both primary and secondary liver malignancies. However, challenging anatomical conditions can lead to prolonged fluoroscopy times (FT), elevated doses of periprocedural X-radiation (DAP), and increased use of contrast agents (CAs). In this study, we examined the influence of our radiologists’ experience and the choice of microspheres on X-ray exposure and CA doses in TARE. Material and Methods: Datasets comprising 161 TARE and 164 preprocedural evaluation angiographies (TARE-EVA) were analyzed. Our study focused on assessing DAP, FT, and CA concerning both microsphere types, the radiologist’s experience, and whether the same radiologist performed both the TARE-EVA and the actual TARE. Results: In TARE, the use of resin microspheres resulted in significantly higher FT and CA compared to glass microspheres (14.3 ± 1.6 min vs. 10.6 ± 1.1 min and 43 ± 2.2 mL vs. 33.6 ± 2.1 mL, p < 0.05), with no notable differences in DAP (p = 0.13). Experienced radiologists demonstrated reduced FT/DAP, with a 19% decrease in DAP and 53% in FT during the evaluation angiography (p < 0.05) and a 49% reduction in DAP during the actual TARE (p < 0.05), with no statistical differences in FT. Performing TARE and TARE-EVA under the same radiologist led to a 43% reduction in DAP and a 25% decrease in FT (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: To mitigate X-radiation exposure, it is advisable for radiologists to undergo thorough training, and, ideally, the same radiologist should conduct both the TARE and the TARE-EVA. While the use of glass spheres may decrease intraarterial CA, it does not significantly impact periprocedural X-ray exposure.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2075-4418
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/24/3609; https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243609
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/3101c054b00c480d84aaca24da2a3680
Accession Number: edsdoj.3101c054b00c480d84aaca24da2a3680
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:20754418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13243609
Published in:Diagnostics
Language:English